Strata scheme UP 1547
UP 1547 Australian Capital Territory
Verdict
Public record: 1 tribunal matter. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $3,000
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT).
Litigation · 1 matter
BISA v THE OWNERS - UNITS PLAN 1547 (Unit Titles) [2023] ACAT 46
Repairs and common property ACAT 25 August 2023
UNIT TITLES – granting of special privilege to the exclusive use of common property – seeking order that the Corporation unreasonably refused to make special privilege rules – operation of special privilege granted terminated by legislation – Corporation decision not to renew special privilege – whether Corporation acted unreasonably in opposing motions to grant special privilege – the operation of section 129(1) and section 129(2) of the ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2008 – finding that it was not unreasonable for the Corporation to oppose motions – whether section 129(1)(d) provides wide-ranging powers to the ACAT to order payment of money but only up to the particular limit of $1,000 – application is dismissed Legislation cited: ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2008 s 18 Unit Titles (Management) Act 2011 ss 20, 30, 31, 112A, 112B, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129 Unit Titles (Management) Act 2011 Republication 13 s 167 Unit Titles (Management) Act 2011 Republication 8 s 22 Units Titles Legislation Amendment Act 2020 s 112 Subordinate Legislation cited: Territory Plan 2008 – 11.1 Parking and Vehicular Access General Code, ss 3.1.5, 3.2.5, Sch 1 – Residential ones Territory Plan 2008 Republication 168 – 3.4 Multi Unit Housing Development Code
Decisions naming this scheme, from ACAT via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 1 matter | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.