← Back to the full dossier
StrataAuditor Public-record dossier

49/21 Darling Street, Barton

UP 355 Barton Act Australian Capital Territory

Verdict

Public record: 1 tribunal matter. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.

Cost exposure

Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.

Low
Good case $500 per lot
Expected $3,000 per lot
Worst case $10,000 per lot
  • Tribunal and legal costs

    Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT).

    $3,000

Litigation · 1 matter

  • DUNCAN v THE OWNERS - UNITS PLAN NO 355 (Unit Titles) [2026] ACAT 25

    Repairs and common property ACAT 22 May 2026

    UNIT TITLES – application seeking to give effect to a motion defeated at Annual General Meeting – where unsuccessful motion sought to amend rules of the units plan – merits review of the unsuccessful motion – where opposition focused on a proposed amendment to a single rule – maintenance of Class A and Class B units – whether opposition to the motion was unreasonable – whether motion, if it is to be given effect, should be given effect as put or amended – whether additional orders should be made Legislation cited: Land Titles (Unit Titles) Act 1970, ss 7, 27, 27A Legislation Act 2001, s 146 Unit Titles Act 2001, ss 10, 11, 17, 18 Unit Titles (Management) Act 2011, ss 7, 8, 9, 10, 16, 24, 73, 80, 81, 83, 88, 89, 91, 106, 107, 108, 129, Schedule 3, cls 3.16, 3.20 Subordinate legislation cited: Unit Titles (Management) Regulation 2011, s 7A, Schedule 1

Decisions naming this scheme, from ACAT via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.

Evidence ledger

Registry-backed record: matched to a scheme on the register by its plan number.

Evidence ledger: what was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when it was last checked.
CheckedFoundMatchLast checked
Registry and parcelLand registryDirectNot harvested here yet
Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reportingNot yet checkedNot matchedNot harvested here yet
Litigation: NCAT and courts1 matterDirectNot harvested here yet
Levies and financialsNot yet checkedNot matchedNot in the public record
Defects and building-work ordersOutside current coverageNot matchedNot harvested here yet
Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigatedNot on the public recordNot matchedNever in the public record

What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.

Compiled by StrataAuditor from ACT units plan register and the relevant licence registers. Litigation from ACAT via AustLII. Records only, as published; unknowns are shown as unknowns.

Coverage caveat: this reflects only what is on the public record for Australian Capital Territory at the time of generation. An empty matters or orders count is not a clean bill: fund balances, current levies, minutes, and defects not yet litigated are never on the public record. Obtain the strata report before you bid.

Public-record summary, not legal or financial advice.

Generated 2 July 2026 · StrataAuditor

strataauditor.com/building/act:UP355