Strata scheme UP 4273
UP 4273 Australian Capital Territory
Verdict
Public record: 1 tribunal matter. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Elevated- $25,000
Serious building-defect rectification
Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $3,000
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT).
Litigation · 1 matter
THE OWNERS - UNITS PLAN No 4273 v STORMER CORPORATION PTY LTD (Unit Titles) [2024] ACAT 31
Building defects ACAT 13 May 2024
UNIT TITLES – where owners corporation required entry to a unit on level 4 to rectify balcony waterproofing defects resulting in water leakage and damage to the interior of a unit on level 3 – where the balcony is not common property – where the balcony is a ‘defined part’ of the building that the owners corporation is responsible to maintain – where the unit owner refused entry to the unit – whether order should be made to allow access to the balcony via externally erected scaffolding – where the respondent failed to appoint an authorised representative and appear at three directions hearing and the final hearing – where former director joined as a party on the initiative of the Tribunal on the premise he is an occupier – where premise found to be incorrect – whether party joined should be removed as a party – whether application should be decided in the absence of the respondent – party-joined removed – relief granted ex parte Legislation cited: ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2008, ss 7, 7A, 47A Unit Titles Act 2001, s 9 Unit Titles (Management) Act 2011, ss 24, 28, 31, 125, 129 Subordinate Legislation cited: ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal Procedures Rules, rr 41, 61
Decisions naming this scheme, from ACAT via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 1 matter | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.