Strata scheme UP 7220
UP 7220 Australian Capital Territory
Verdict
Public record: 1 tribunal matter. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Elevated- $25,000
Serious building-defect rectification
Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $3,000
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT).
Litigation · 1 matter
DALTON v THE OWNERS - UNITS PLAN No 7220 (Unit Titles) [2025] ACAT 39
Repairs and common property ACAT 11 June 2025
UNIT TILTES – merits review of a failed motion at a general meeting of the owners corporation – where motion sought retrospective approval for alterations made to the deck and balcony railing of a townhouse without prior approval of the owners corporation in breach of default rule 1.4 – where breach of the rule was inadvertent, rather than deliberate – where alterations enhanced the appearance, liveability and value of the unit without detracting in any material respect from the visual appeal of the complex or having any adverse effect on the value of other properties in the complex – where the Tribunal was satisfied that the correct or preferable decision was to give effect to the motion and that opposition to the motion was unreasonable – order made giving effect to the motion Legislation cited: Legislation Act 2001, s 132(1) Unit Titles Legislation Amendment Act 2020 (repealed), s 146 Unit Titles (Management) Act 2011, ss 106, 108(1) 129(1)(g), sched. 3 (s 3.16) Subordinate Legislation cited: Unit Titles (Management) Regulation 2011, sched. 1
Decisions naming this scheme, from ACAT via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 1 matter | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.