Strata scheme UP 836
UP 836 Australian Capital Territory
Verdict
Public record: 1 tribunal matter. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $3,000
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT).
Litigation · 1 matter
HONEYBROOK v OWNERS OF UNITS PLAN 836; FROGBOTT PTY LIMITED v OWNERS OF UNITS PLAN 836 (Discrimination and Unit Titles) [2023] ACAT 2
Repairs and common property ACAT 10 January 2023
DISCRIMINATION – indirect discrimination – protected attributes – disability – association – loss suffered by the business – obstruction to clients with disabilities – whether business had ‘association’ with protected attribute – scope of ‘association’ under the Discrimination Act 1991 – condition or requirement – ‑claim for compensation – proof and quantum of alleged loss – no substitution of business as applicant in proceedings UNIT TITLES – unreasonable interference with use and enjoyment of common property – no special privilege granted – substitution of owner as applicant in proceedings Legislation cited: ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2008 s 48 Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) s 4 Discrimination Act 1991 ss 4A, 4AA, 5AA ,7, 8, 19, 20 Equal Opportunity Act 2010 (Vic) s 6 Human Rights Commission Act 2005 ss 53, 53A, 53CA, 53E Legislation Act 2001 s 160 Uncollected Goods Act 1996 Unit Titles Management Act 2011 ss 22, 112A, 125, 129 Subordinate Legislation cited: ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2020 rr 39, 41 Unit Titles (Management) Regulation 2011 sch 1
Decisions naming this scheme, from ACAT via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 1 matter | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.