← Back to the full dossier
StrataAuditor Public-record dossier

Strata scheme UP 94

UP 94 Australian Capital Territory

Verdict

Public record: 1 tribunal matter. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.

Cost exposure

Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.

Low
Good case $500 per lot
Expected $3,000 per lot
Worst case $10,000 per lot
  • Tribunal and legal costs

    Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT).

    $3,000

Litigation · 1 matter

  • HICKS v THE OWNERS - UNIT PLAN NO 94 (Civil Dispute) [2023] ACAT 78

    Repairs and common property ACAT 7 December 2023

    CIVIL DISPUTE – statutory duty of owners corporation to maintain common property – duty to maintain common property includes taking steps to prevent common property from falling into disrepair, repairing common property when it is in disrepair, and carrying out repairs of any damage to other property occurring as a result of disrepair in the common property – statutory obligation to carry out repairs within a reasonable time – whether damage to the common property would cause real disruption to the tenant – whether unit owner is entitled to civil remedy where income is affected by damage to unit caused by disrepair of common property – whether a breach of a statutory duty gives rise to a civil remedy – evidence insufficient to found a claim of negligence – statutory remedy awarded pursuant to section 129(1)(d) of the Unit Titles (Management) Act 2011 Legislation cited: Unit Titles (Management) Act 2011 ss 19, 24, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 (NSW) s 226 Strata Schemes (Freehold Development) Act 1973 (NSW) s 105

Decisions naming this scheme, from ACAT via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.

Evidence ledger

Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.

Evidence ledger: what was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when it was last checked.
CheckedFoundMatchLast checked
Registry and parcelLand registryStub onlyNot harvested here yet
Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reportingNot yet checkedNot matchedNot harvested here yet
Litigation: NCAT and courts1 matterDirectNot harvested here yet
Levies and financialsNot yet checkedNot matchedNot in the public record
Defects and building-work ordersOutside current coverageNot matchedNot harvested here yet
Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigatedNot on the public record, and no registry entry for this schemeNot matchedNever in the public record

What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.

Compiled by StrataAuditor from ACT units plan register and the relevant licence registers. Litigation from ACAT via AustLII. Records only, as published; unknowns are shown as unknowns.

Coverage caveat: this reflects only what is on the public record for Australian Capital Territory at the time of generation. An empty matters or orders count is not a clean bill: fund balances, current levies, minutes, and defects not yet litigated are never on the public record. Obtain the strata report before you bid.

Public-record summary, not legal or financial advice.

Generated 2 July 2026 · StrataAuditor

strataauditor.com/building/act:UP94