Strata scheme SP 55773
SP 55773 New South Wales
Verdict
Public record: 4 tribunal matters, no building-work orders. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a section 184 strata search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $5,000
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 4 matters.
Litigation · 4 matters
Roden v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 55773 [2021] NSWCATCD 61
By-laws NSWCATCD 30 August 2021
STRATA – keeping of animals by-law – challenge to its validity - whether parts of by-law enhance or preserve other lot owners' enjoyment or amenity in the scheme – relevant parts found not beyond power and not harsh unconscionable or oppressive
The Owners – Strata Plan No 55773 v Roden (Costs) [2020] NSWCATAP 197
Costs and procedure NSWCATAP 29 September 2020
COSTS – s 60 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) – special circumstances – complexity of proceedings – issue not previously decided by Appeal Panel – overruling of previous first instance decision – costs of non-party application to be joined in appeal.
The Owners – Strata Plan No 55773 v Roden; Spiers v The Owners – Strata Plan No 77953 [2020] NSWCATAP 95
By-laws NSWCATAP 27 May 2020
LAND LAW – Strata title – Strata Schemes Management Act 2015, ss 136, 139,150 – By-laws – Power to make by-laws – By-law not to be harsh, unconscionable or oppressive – Whether by-laws prohibiting the keeping of animals and/or regulating the number of animals that can be kept is harsh, unconscionable or oppressive
Roden v The Owners-Strata Plan No 55773 [2019] NSWCATCD 61
By-laws NSWCATCD 18 September 2019
By-law banning all animals
Decisions naming this scheme, from NSW Caselaw (NCAT and the courts). The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | NSW Strata Hub | Stub only | Awaiting first run |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 4 matters | Direct | 28 June 2026 |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Checked, none found | Direct | 28 June 2026 |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.