← Back to the full dossier
StrataAuditor Public-record dossier

Strata scheme SP 61424

SP 61424 New South Wales

Verdict

Public record: 2 tribunal matters, no building-work orders. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a section 184 strata search, before you bid.

Cost exposure

Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.

Low
Good case $500 per lot
Expected $3,700 per lot
Worst case $13,000 per lot
  • Tribunal and legal costs

    Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 2 matters.

    $3,700

Litigation · 2 matters

  • Ace Woollahra Pty Ltd v The Owners—Strata Plan 61424 & Anor [2010] NSWCA 101

    Other NSWCA 17 May 2010

    BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION—Home Building Act 1989 Part 2C—joint venture to construct aged person units—one joint venturer contracts with builder to erect units on land—other joint venturer is the registered proprietor of the land—owners corporation acquires title from registered proprietor—whether owners corporation is entitled to the benefit of a statutory warranty enforceable against the builder by operation of s 18D of the Home Building Act 1989

  • The Owners Strata Plan 61424 & Anor v Reed Constructions Pty Limited [2009] NSWSC 692

    Other NSWSC 24 July 2009

    Statutory construction - Interpretation Act 1987 - Home Building Act 1989 - Examination of what are the circumstances that entitle a person to the benefit of a statutory warranty as provided for in section 18D of the Home Building Act - Whether the statutory scheme avoids the requirement of privity of contract because it provides its own criterion, which is whether the work was done on behalf of the relevant person - Holding that section 18D avoids the privity of contract rule

Decisions naming this scheme, from NSW Caselaw (NCAT and the courts). The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.

Evidence ledger

Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.

Evidence ledger: what was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when it was last checked.
CheckedFoundMatchLast checked
Registry and parcelNSW Strata HubStub onlyAwaiting first run
Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reportingNot yet checkedNot matchedNot harvested here yet
Litigation: NCAT and courts2 mattersDirect28 June 2026
Levies and financialsNot yet checkedNot matchedNot in the public record
Defects and building-work ordersChecked, none foundDirect28 June 2026
Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigatedNot on the public record, and no registry entry for this schemeNot matchedNever in the public record

What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.

Compiled by StrataAuditor from NSW Strata Hub (DCS Spatial Services) and the relevant licence registers. Litigation from NSW Caselaw (NCAT and the courts). Records only, as published; unknowns are shown as unknowns.

Coverage caveat: this reflects only what is on the public record for New South Wales at the time of generation. An empty matters or orders count is not a clean bill: fund balances, current levies, minutes, and defects not yet litigated are never on the public record. Obtain the strata report before you bid.

Public-record summary, not legal or financial advice.

Generated 4 July 2026 · StrataAuditor

strataauditor.com/building/nsw:SP61424