2b Wentworth Street Point Piper
SP 6534 · Registered 15 February 1973 · 12 lots · Woollahra · New South Wales checked 10 June 2026
Public record: 7 tribunal matters, no building-work orders. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a section 184 strata search, before you bid.
- 7 tribunal or court matters, the most serious about by-laws
- $6,300 indicative cost exposure per lot, moderate band
The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a section 184 strata search before you bid.
-
Public record checked
Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
- Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a section 184 strata search if you do not have it yet.
- Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
-
Decide
Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.
Risk read
What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a section 184 strata search before you bid.
-
7 litigation matters on record
Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.
-
No recent annual reporting on the Strata Hub
We could not find a current annual return for this scheme on the NSW Strata Hub. That may just be a gap in the public data, but a non-reporting scheme can also signal a disengaged committee, ask for the last two AGM minutes.
Cost exposure
Moderate exposureAn indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.
| Driver | Good | Expected | Worst |
|---|---|---|---|
Tribunal and legal costs 7 tribunal or court matters on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 7 matters. | $700 | $6,300 | $24,900 |
| Total per lot | $700 | $6,300 | $24,900 |
Across all 12 lots, an expected program of this kind is on the order of $75,600 building-wide, before any government contribution.
Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.
Questions to ask before you bid
- 1
What was the levy or contributions dispute about, and are any unfunded works coming?
Because we found a levy/contributions matter on record.
- 2
What by-laws apply to pets, parking, short-stay letting, and renovations, and have any been disputed?
Because we found a by-law matter on record.
- 3
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
- 4
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
- 5
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?
Ask about this building
Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.
Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 7 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.
Building record
Strata plan SP 6534 was registered on 15 February 1973 in the Woollahra council area and comprises 12 lots.
It is located at 2b Wentworth Street Point Piper.
Parcel geometry for the scheme is held on file.
Litigation
- Owners Corporation SP6534 v Elkhouri (No 2) [2025] NSWCA 237
Costs and procedure NSWCA 29 October 2025
JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS — Application to vary orders — Where head of claim dismissed by primary judge on particular basis — Where basis successfully disturbed on appeal — Where head of claim not reagitated on appeal — Where Court of Appeal referred “remaining amounts claimed” to referee — Whether head of claim included in reference — Whether orders should be varied to include head of claim in reference
- Owners Corporation SP6534 v Elkhouri; Owners Corporation SP6534 v Perpetual Corporate Trust Ltd [2024] NSWCA 279
By-laws NSWCA 27 November 2024
COURTS AND JUDGES – Supreme Court – Jurisdiction – Whether Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction to make declaration that condition of by-law unjust – Where statute conferred function of finding condition unjust on NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal LAND LAW – Strata title – By-laws – Whether condition of by-law that exclusive use rights cease unless obligations complied with unjust – Whether condition harsh, oppressive or unconscionable – Whether respondents liable in damages under by-law for fa
- El Khouri v Owners Corporation SP6534 [2024] NSWSC 537
Other NSWSC 19 April 2024
JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS – amending, varying and setting aside orders – corrections under slip rule – orders amended
- Perpetual Corporate Trust Ltd v Owners Corporation SP6534; El Khouri v Owners Corporation SP6534 (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 358
Costs and procedure NSWSC 8 April 2024
COSTS – Costs assessment – Determination – Mixed results – Parties succeeding and failing in both claims and cross claims – Intent to find just and equitable costs solution to whole of the proceedings
- Perpetual Corporate Trust Ltd v Owners Corporation SP6534; El Khouri v Owners Corporation SP6534 [2024] NSWSC 173
Levies and contributions NSWSC 28 February 2024
LAND LAW – Strata title – By-laws – Whether By-law granting exclusive use rights conditional on four critical obligations had been complied with – Whether clause of By-law ceasing exclusive use rights unless critical obligations were complied with is unjust – Whether clause of By-law ceasing exclusive use rights unless critical obligations were complied with is unconscionable, harsh or oppressive – Whether special levies are unreasonable – Award as to damages- reasonableness of costs – quantum a
- The Owners-Strata Plan No 6534 v El Khouri [2015] NSWCATCD 147
By-laws NSWCATCD 4 December 2015
Prescription of special By-law – persons entitled to vote at general meetings.
- The Owners Strata Plan No 6534 v El Khouri [2015] NSWCATCD 145
By-laws NSWCATCD 4 December 2015
Failure to comply with By-laws, implied duty to cooperate, estoppel, waiver.
Companies named in these matters
Builders, developers, and contractors named opposite this scheme. A company appearing across many schemes is a pattern worth a closer look before you buy.
Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from NSW Caselaw (NCAT and the courts). The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Compared to Point Piper
In Point Piper, 6% of 65 strata schemes carry a tribunal matter on the public record. This scheme's 7 matters are in line with the local average of 5 per litigated scheme.
The Point Piper dispute landscape →Evidence ledger
Registry-backed record: matched to a scheme on the register by its plan number.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | NSW Strata Hub, with geometry | Direct | Awaiting first run |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 7 matters | Direct | 28 June 2026 |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Checked, none found | Direct | 28 June 2026 |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.
Deep report · coming soon
On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.