49-53 Regent Street Chippendale
SP 70871 · Registered 14 August 2003 · 61 lots · Sydney · New South Wales checked 10 June 2026
Public record: 7 tribunal matters, no building-work orders. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a section 184 strata search, before you bid.
- 7 tribunal or court matters, the most serious about building defects
- $33,900 indicative cost exposure per lot, elevated band
The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a section 184 strata search before you bid.
-
Public record checked
Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
- Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a section 184 strata search if you do not have it yet.
- Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
-
Decide
Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.
Risk read
What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a section 184 strata search before you bid.
-
7 litigation matters on record
Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.
-
Building-defect dispute on record
A matter touches building defects or rectification work. Ask whether the work is funded and whether the builder's warranty still applies.
Statutory warranty: structural cover likely expired (est. 14 August 2010); non-structural ran to 14 August 2010. A single 7-year warranty period applies because the scheme was registered before the 1 February 2012 reform. Estimated from the registration date, not the completion date or building contract, so treat the dates as indicative.
-
No recent annual reporting on the Strata Hub
We could not find a current annual return for this scheme on the NSW Strata Hub. That may just be a gap in the public data, but a non-reporting scheme can also signal a disengaged committee, ask for the last two AGM minutes.
Cost exposure
Elevated exposureAn indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.
| Driver | Good | Expected | Worst |
|---|---|---|---|
Serious building-defect rectification A decision on this scheme was classified as a building-defect matter. Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter. | $8,300 | $27,600 | $91,400 |
Tribunal and legal costs 7 tribunal or court matters on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 7 matters. | $700 | $6,300 | $24,900 |
| Total per lot | $9,000 | $33,900 | $116,300 |
Across all 61 lots, an expected program of this kind is on the order of $2,067,900 building-wide, before any government contribution.
Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.
Questions to ask before you bid
- 1
What building defects have been identified, is there a funded rectification plan, and does the builder's warranty still apply?
Because we found a building-defect dispute on record.
- 2
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
- 3
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
- 4
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?
Ask about this building
Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.
Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 7 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.
Building record
Strata plan SP 70871 was registered on 14 August 2003 in the Sydney council area and comprises 61 lots.
It is located at 49-53 Regent Street Chippendale.
Parcel geometry for the scheme is held on file.
Litigation
- The Owners - Strata Plan No 70871 v Turek [2022] NSWCATAP 83
Costs and procedure NSWCATAP 28 March 2022
COSTS---withdrawal of proceedings---whether special circumstances established
- Turek v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 70871 [2021] NSWCATCD 79
Other NSWCATCD 3 August 2021
LAND LAW — Strata title — Grant of licence —— Reasonable use and enjoyment of Lot
- The Owners – Strata Plan No 70871 v Turek [2020] NSWSC 1027
Costs and procedure NSWSC 5 August 2020
APPEALS — Appeal from NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal Appeal Panel — application for leave — whether proceedings were required to be dismissed if commenced
- The Owners - Strata Plan No 70871 v Turek (No 2) [2020] NSWCATAP 89
Building defects NSWCATAP 19 May 2020
Appeal proceedings – costs-grounds of appeal inadequately expressed - no merit in the appeal - held defects in Notice of Appeal, lack of merit in certain appeal arguments together with disingenuous conduct of appellant’s solicitor constituted special circumstances-costs order made.
- The Owners – Strata Plan No 70871 v Turek [2020] NSWCATAP 28
Costs and procedure NSWCATAP 28 February 2020
Appeal proceedings – grounds of appeal inadequately expressed – appeal from interlocutory decision requiring leave –application of guiding principle-held no merit in the appeal – leave to appeal refused – appeal dismissed – costs reserved.
- The Owners - Strata Plan No 70871 v Turek [2020] NSWCATAP 29
Costs and procedure NSWCATAP 28 February 2020
COSTS – costs on stay application in appeal – special circumstances
- Turek v The Owners - Strata Plan No 70871 [2020] NSWCATAP 14
Costs and procedure NSWCATAP 29 January 2020
Costs – costs on appeal – special circumstances
Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from NSW Caselaw (NCAT and the courts). The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Decisions, in detail
Read from each decision's own text: the parties and their roles, who presided, how it ended, and the money in play. Every row links to the source.
- The Owners - Strata Plan No 70871 v Turek [2022] NSWCATAP 83 Costs and procedure · Respondent successful G Sarginson, Senior Member; A Boxall, Senior Member
The Appeal Panel dismissed the costs application and ordered each party to bear its own costs of the appeal proceedings, finding no special circumstances warranted departure from the default rule under section 60 of the NCAT Act.
- The Owners - Strata Plan No 70871 (owners corp)
- Michael Turek (lot owner)
- Louise Turek (lot owner)
- Turek v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 70871 [2021] NSWCATCD 79
The Tribunal granted the applicants a licence to store two 240-litre waste bins in the common property bin room for 10 years subject to a monthly licence fee of $50 and specified conditions.
- Michael Turek (lot owner)
- Louise Turek (lot owner)
- The Owners - Strata Plan No. 70871 (owners corp)
Compared to Chippendale
In Chippendale, 6% of 67 strata schemes carry a tribunal matter on the public record. This scheme's 7 matters are well above the local average of 3 per litigated scheme.
The Chippendale dispute landscape →Evidence ledger
Registry-backed record: matched to a scheme on the register by its plan number.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | NSW Strata Hub, with geometry | Direct | Awaiting first run |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 7 matters | Direct | 28 June 2026 |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Checked, none found | Direct | 28 June 2026 |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.
Deep report · coming soon
On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.