← Back to the full dossier
StrataAuditor Public-record dossier

79-81 Berry Street North Sydney

SP 74602 North Sydney North Sydney New South Wales

Verdict

Public record: 8 tribunal matters, no building-work orders. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a section 184 strata search, before you bid.

Cost exposure

Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.

Moderate
Good case $700 per lot
Expected $6,300 per lot
Worst case $24,900 per lot
  • Tribunal and legal costs

    Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 8 matters.

    $6,300

Litigation · 8 matters

  • The Owners – Strata Plan 74602 v Eastmark Holdings Pty Ltd; Eastmark Holdings Pty Ltd v The Owners – Strata Plan 74602 [2016] NSWSC 496

    Other NSWSC 22 April 2016

    JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS - matters arising from earlier

  • The Owners – Strata Plan 74602 v Eastmark Holdings Pty Ltd; Eastmark Holdings Pty Ltd v The Owners – Strata Plan 74602 [2015] NSWSC 1981

    By-laws NSWSC 24 December 2015

    STRATA TITLES – mixed residential, commercial, retail and car parking development – allocation of the costs of shared services – proper construction of strata management statement – whether allocation of costs of shared services under strata management statement fair and reasonable – whether strata management statement an unjust contract for the purposes of the Contracts Review Act 1980 – whether strata management statement should be re-written – whether any amendment to strata management statem

  • The Owners – Strata Plan No 74602 v Brookfield Australia Investments Ltd [2015] NSWSC 1916

    Other NSWSC 16 December 2015

    BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – design and construct contract between developer and first defendant – plaintiff successor in title to developer – whether first defendant breached statutory warranties under s 18B(a), (b) and (f) of the Home Building Act 1989, as incorporated into the contract – whether facade was designed and constructed in accordance with the “Hyder Specification” as incorporated in the contract – proper construction of the Hyder Specification – whether a reasonable businessperson w

  • The Owners – Strata Plan No 74602 v Brookfield Australia Investments Ltd [2015] NSWSC 1682

    Other NSWSC 12 November 2015

    PROCEDURE – application for leave to reopen – applicable principles – factors relevant to exercise of discretion – lengthy hearing –

  • The Owners – Strata Plan No 74602 v Brookfield Australia Investments Ltd [2015] NSWSC 1144

    Other NSWSC 11 August 2015

    EVIDENCE – admissibility – discretion to exclude or limit the use of evidence – whether lay observational evidence adduced by plaintiff after cut-off date of “guillotine order” is evidence-in-chief or in reply – if in chief, whether leave should be given to adduce that evidence – whether defendants would be prejudiced if that evidence is admitted – whether use of evidence should be limited to exclude evidence of April 2015 storm event

  • Eastmark Holdings v The Owners Corporation Strata Plan No 74602 [2014] NSWSC 134

    Other NSWSC 21 February 2014

    JUDGMENTS & ORDERS - Judgments - Summary

  • The Owners - Strata Plan No. 74602 v Eastmark Holdings Pty Limited [2013] NSWCA 221

    Costs and procedure NSWCA 19 July 2013

    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - legal professional privilege - where privilege asserted by owners corporation against lot owner - whether common or joint interest applies - where subpoenaed documents related to a proceeding that lot owner pursued solely for benefit of owners corporation and in which lot owner sought no relief against owners corporation - where owners corporation sought to dispute that claim by lot owner - where subpoenaed documents also related to other proceedings in which owners corp

  • Eastmark Holdings Pty Ltd v Owners Strata Plan 74602 [2009] NSWSC 1483

    Costs and procedure NSWSC 11 December 2009

    COSTS – where plaintiff seeks leave to discontinue proceedings in light of action taken by defendant after proceedings instituted which removes need for further proceedings – where plaintiff’s success is only partial – whether to depart from ordinary costs consequences of discontinuance.

Decisions naming this scheme, from NSW Caselaw (NCAT and the courts). The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.

Statutory-warranty outlook

Structural cover
Likely expired · est. expiry 6 April 2012
Non-structural cover
Ran to 6 April 2012

A single 7-year warranty period applies because the scheme was registered before the 1 February 2012 reform. Estimated from the registration date, not the completion date or building contract, so treat the dates as indicative.

Evidence ledger

Registry-backed record: matched to a scheme on the register by its plan number.

Evidence ledger: what was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when it was last checked.
CheckedFoundMatchLast checked
Registry and parcelNSW Strata Hub, with geometryDirectAwaiting first run
Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reportingNot yet checkedNot matchedNot harvested here yet
Litigation: NCAT and courts8 mattersDirect28 June 2026
Levies and financialsNot yet checkedNot matchedNot in the public record
Defects and building-work ordersChecked, none foundDirect28 June 2026
Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigatedNot on the public recordNot matchedNever in the public record

What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.

Compiled by StrataAuditor from NSW Strata Hub (DCS Spatial Services) and the relevant licence registers. Litigation from NSW Caselaw (NCAT and the courts). Records only, as published; unknowns are shown as unknowns.

Coverage caveat: this reflects only what is on the public record for New South Wales at the time of generation. An empty matters or orders count is not a clean bill: fund balances, current levies, minutes, and defects not yet litigated are never on the public record. Obtain the strata report before you bid.

Public-record summary, not legal or financial advice.

Generated 2 July 2026 · StrataAuditor

strataauditor.com/building/nsw:SP74602