Strata scheme SP 80609
SP 80609 New South Wales
Verdict
Public record: 2 tribunal matters, no building-work orders. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a section 184 strata search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Elevated- $25,000
Serious building-defect rectification
Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $3,700
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 2 matters.
Litigation · 2 matters
Brenchley v The Owners – Strata Plan No 80609 [2022] NSWSC 646
Costs and procedure NSWSC 23 May 2022
COSTS — party/party — general rule that costs follow the event — Court orders termination of strata scheme and winding-up of owners corporation — numerous appearances in Supreme Court and New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal — parties achieve compromise in fact with assistance of Court and compulsory manager — application of principles in Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622; [1997] HCA 6 — no order as to costs
Owners Corporation SP 80609 v Paragon Construction (NSW) Pty Limited [2018] NSWSC 266
Costs and procedure NSWSC 2 March 2018
CIVIL PROCEDURE – application by builder and developer for leave to bring cross claim against principal certifying authority – whether cross claim maintainable at law – whether principal certifying authority owes duty of care to first plaintiff – whether any liabilities which exist are coordinate – where prior questions of law unable to be quickly and easily resolved – where no prejudice to the principal certifying authority exists aside from costs and inconvenience – leave granted CIVIL PROCEDU
Decisions naming this scheme, from NSW Caselaw (NCAT and the courts). The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | NSW Strata Hub | Stub only | Awaiting first run |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 2 matters | Direct | 28 June 2026 |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Checked, none found | Direct | 28 June 2026 |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.