3 Donnellan Circuit Clovelly

SP 84741 · Registered 9 October 2012 · 6 lots · Randwick · New South Wales checked 10 June 2026

Public record: 3 tribunal matters, no building-work orders. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a section 184 strata search, before you bid.

The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a section 184 strata search before you bid.

  1. Public record checked

    Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.

  2. Read the strata report →

    Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a section 184 strata search if you do not have it yet.

  3. Questions to ask

    The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.

  4. Decide

    Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.

Risk read

What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a section 184 strata search before you bid.

  • 3 litigation matters on record

    Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.

  • Builder named across multiple schemes

    Nazero Constructions Pty Ltd is named in litigation at 2 strata schemes, a cross-scheme pattern worth checking before you buy.

  • No recent annual reporting on the Strata Hub

    We could not find a current annual return for this scheme on the NSW Strata Hub. That may just be a gap in the public data, but a non-reporting scheme can also signal a disengaged committee, ask for the last two AGM minutes.

Cost exposure

Low exposure

An indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.

Good case $600 per lot
Expected $4,300 per lot
Worst case $15,900 per lot

Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.

Exposure drivers, indicative per-lot ranges
DriverGoodExpectedWorst

Tribunal and legal costs

3 tribunal or court matters on the public record.

Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters.

$600$4,300$15,900
Total per lot$600$4,300$15,900

Across all 6 lots, an expected program of this kind is on the order of $25,800 building-wide, before any government contribution.

Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.

Questions to ask before you bid

  • 1

    The building's builder is named in disputes at other schemes, is the original builder still solvent for a warranty claim?

    Because Nazero Constructions Pty Ltd appears at 2 schemes.

  • 2

    What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?

  • 3

    Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?

  • 4

    Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?

Ask about this building

Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.

Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 3 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.

Building record

Strata plan SP 84741 was registered on 9 October 2012 in the Randwick council area and comprises 6 lots.

It is located at 3 Donnellan Circuit Clovelly.

Parcel geometry for the scheme is held on file.

nothing found matters order
View on the full map →

Litigation

  • The Owners – Strata Plan 84741 v Nazero Constructions Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1241

    Costs and procedure NSWSC 15 September 2017

    COSTS – indemnity costs – offer of compromise – whether plaintiff obtained a result no less favourable than offer – whether component of agreed verdict should be seen as damages in the nature of interest – whether court should otherwise order for purpose of UCPR r 42.14

  • The Owners - Strata Plan No 84741 v Nazero Constructions Pty Limited & Ors (Costs) [2016] NSWSC 965

    Costs and procedure NSWSC 13 July 2016

    COSTS – where separate questions ordered – where number of questions reduced to a single question at hearing – whether successful parties should have their costs – whether successful parties’ costs should be reduced by reason of the reduction in the number of questions to be determined SEPARATE QUESTIONS – expectation that the Court will be cautious – need for precise formulation of questions and agreed facts – prospect that the Court may decline to answer questions if inappropriate to do so

  • The Owners - Strata Plan No 84741 v Nazero Constructions Pty Limited & Ors [2016] NSWSC 832

    Other NSWSC 22 June 2016

    [DEEDS] - where construction contract between two parties - where performance of one party to construction contract guaranteed by third party - where the three parties execute a Deed of variation and release at same time as settling proceedings between two of those parties to which the guarantor was not a party - construction of the Deed - meaning of the expression “the parties” - separate question as to whether guarantor released from obligation to guarantee certain obligations of the party not

Companies named in these matters

Builders, developers, and contractors named opposite this scheme. A company appearing across many schemes is a pattern worth a closer look before you buy.

Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from NSW Caselaw (NCAT and the courts). The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.

Compared to Clovelly

In Clovelly, 2% of 128 strata schemes carry a tribunal matter on the public record. This scheme's 3 matters are in line with the local average of 2.3 per litigated scheme.

The Clovelly dispute landscape →

Evidence ledger

Registry-backed record: matched to a scheme on the register by its plan number.

Evidence ledger: what was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when it was last checked.
CheckedFoundMatchLast checked
Registry and parcelNSW Strata Hub, with geometryDirectAwaiting first run
Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reportingNot yet checkedNot matchedNot harvested here yet
Litigation: NCAT and courts3 mattersDirect28 June 2026
Levies and financialsNot yet checkedNot matchedNot in the public record
Defects and building-work ordersChecked, none foundDirect28 June 2026
Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigatedNot on the public recordNot matchedNever in the public record

What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.

Deep report · coming soon

On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.

Source: NSW Strata Hub (DCS Spatial Services); litigation from NSW Caselaw (NCAT and the courts), checked 10 June 2026. Records only, as published.

Spotted something wrong? Report an issue with a fact — every claim above links to its public source.

← Search another scheme