141-143 Elizabeth Street Sydney

SP 89074 · Registered 21 November 2013 · 20 lots · Sydney · New South Wales checked 10 June 2026

Prepare for client / Print Strata in Sydney →

Public record: 3 tribunal matters, no building-work orders. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a section 184 strata search, before you bid.

3 tribunal or court matters, the most serious about other
Ceerose Pty Ltd is named at 3 schemes, a cross-scheme pattern
$33,800 indicative cost exposure per lot, elevated band

The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a section 184 strata search before you bid.

Public record checked

Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a section 184 strata search if you do not have it yet.
Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
Decide

Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.

Risk read

What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a section 184 strata search before you bid.

3 litigation matters on record

Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.
Building-defect dispute on record

A matter touches building defects or rectification work. Ask whether the work is funded and whether the builder's warranty still applies.

Statutory warranty: structural cover likely expired (est. 21 November 2019); non-structural ran to 21 November 2015. NSW Home Building Act periods: 6 years for major or structural defects, 2 years for all others. Estimated from the registration date, not the completion date or building contract, so treat the dates as indicative.
Builder named across multiple schemes

Ceerose Pty Ltd is named in litigation at 3 strata schemes, a cross-scheme pattern worth checking before you buy.
No recent annual reporting on the Strata Hub

We could not find a current annual return for this scheme on the NSW Strata Hub. That may just be a gap in the public data, but a non-reporting scheme can also signal a disengaged committee, ask for the last two AGM minutes.

Cost exposure

Elevated exposure

An indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.

Good case $9,100 per lot

Expected $33,800 per lot

Worst case $115,500 per lot

Your lot's share versus an average lot 1.0×

Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.

Exposure drivers, indicative per-lot ranges
Driver	Good	Expected	Worst
Serious building-defect rectification A decision on this scheme was classified as a building-defect matter. Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 2 matters.	$8,500	$29,500	$99,600
Tribunal and legal costs 3 tribunal or court matters on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters.	$600	$4,300	$15,900
Total per lot	$9,100	$33,800	$115,500

Across all 20 lots, an expected program of this kind is on the order of $676,000 building-wide, before any government contribution.

Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.

Questions to ask before you bid

1
What building defects have been identified, is there a funded rectification plan, and does the builder's warranty still apply?

Because we found a building-defect dispute on record.
2
The building's builder is named in disputes at other schemes, is the original builder still solvent for a warranty claim?

Because Ceerose Pty Ltd appears at 3 schemes.
3
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
4
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
5
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?

Ask about this building

Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.

Save scheme Add to list Monitor

Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 3 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.

Building record

Strata plan SP 89074 was registered on 21 November 2013 in the Sydney council area and comprises 20 lots.

It is located at 141-143 Elizabeth Street Sydney.

Parcel geometry for the scheme is held on file.

nothing found matters order

View on the full map →

Litigation

Ceerose Pty Ltd v The Owners – Strata Plan No 89074 [2025] NSWCA 235
NSWCA 27 October 2025
The Owners – Strata Plan No 89074 v Ceerose Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 1494
Other NSWSC 26 November 2024

BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – claim for breach of statutory warranties under Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) – proceedings on foot for 8 years –
The Owners – Strata Plan No 89074 v Ceerose Pty Ltd & Anor [2020] NSWSC 854
Costs and procedure NSWSC 2 July 2020

CIVIL PROCEDURE – direction to serve expert evidence – guillotine order – affidavit served 17 business days after due date – whether plaintiff should have leave to rely on the affidavit – whether prejudice to defendant demonstrated

Companies named in these matters

Ceerose Pty Ltd, named in litigation at 3 strata schemes
Ceerose Pty Ltd & Anor

Builders, developers, and contractors named opposite this scheme. A company appearing across many schemes is a pattern worth a closer look before you buy.

Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from NSW Caselaw (NCAT and the courts). The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.

Decisions, in detail

Read from each decision's own text: the parties and their roles, who presided, how it ended, and the money in play. Every row links to the source.

Ceerose Pty Ltd v The Owners – Strata Plan No 89074 [2025] NSWCA 235
Building defects · Respondent successful Kirk JA (with Leeming JA and Ball JA agreeing) $1,950,000

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appellants' appeal and upheld the primary judge's decision adopting the referee's reports, which found the respondent owners corporation was not required to provide the builder with further opportunities to rectify defects and was entitled to judgment for approximately $1.95 million in rectification costs.
- Ceerose Pty Ltd (builder)
- Prisand Investments Australia Pty Limited ACN 105 064 239 (developer)
- The Owners – Strata Plan No 89074 (owners corp)
The Owners – Strata Plan No 89074 v Ceerose Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 1494
Building defects · Applicant successful Rees J $1,952,984

The Court adopted the referee's reports on liability and quantum with minor corrections, entering judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $1,952,984 for breach of statutory warranties under the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW).
- The Owners – Strata Plan No 89074 (owners corp)
- Ceerose Pty Ltd (builder)
- Prisand Investments Australia Pty Ltd (developer)

Compared to Sydney

In Sydney, 15% of 204 strata schemes carry a tribunal matter on the public record. This scheme's 3 matters are in line with the local average of 2.3 per litigated scheme.

The Sydney dispute landscape →

Evidence ledger

Registry-backed record: matched to a scheme on the register by its plan number.

Evidence ledger: what was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when it was last checked.
Checked	Found	Match	Last checked
Registry and parcel	NSW Strata Hub, with geometry	Direct	Awaiting first run
Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting	Not yet checked	Not matched	Not harvested here yet
Litigation: NCAT and courts	3 matters	Direct	28 June 2026
Levies and financials	Not yet checked	Not matched	Not in the public record
Defects and building-work orders	Checked, none found	Direct	28 June 2026
Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated	Not on the public record	Not matched	Never in the public record

What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.

Deep report · coming soon

On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.