Strata scheme CTS 10299
CTS 10299 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 4 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Elevated- $25,000
Serious building-defect rectification
Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $5,000
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 4 matters.
Litigation · 4 matters
Munna Beach Apartments [2023] QBCCMCmr 436
Nuisance and behaviour QBCCMCmr 9 November 2023
NUISANCE / HAZARD – where the respondent smokes on Lot 7’s balcony – where the occupiers of Lot 32 say they are exposed to second-hand smoke and allege this is causing a nuisance, a hazard, or an unreasonable interference – where the respondent is no longer an occupier in the scheme – whether the application should be dismissed Act, ss 227, 270
Munna Beach Apartments [2023] QBCCMCmr 96
Nuisance and behaviour QBCCMCmr 6 March 2023
APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDER – where the respondent smokes on Lot 7’s balcony – where the occupiers of Lot 32 say they are exposed to second-hand smoke and allege this is causing a nuisance, a hazard, or an unreasonable interference – whether there are urgent circumstances to warrant granting an interim order prohibiting the respondent from smoking on Lot 7’s balcony Act, ss 59, 167, 276, 279
Munna Beach Apartments [2021] QBCCMCmr 317
By-laws QBCCMCmr 29 June 2021
PET DOG – COMMITTEE DECISION – REASONABLENESS – where by-law requires committee approval to keep a pet – where committee refused lot owner’s request to keep a dog – where committee cites other owners’ opposition to keeping pets – whether committee decision was unreasonable – whether to deem applicants have approval to keep a dog. Act, s 100(5)
Munna Beach Apartments [2021] QBCCMCmr 73
Other QBCCMCmr 15 February 2021
INTERIM ORDER – where committee refused lot owners’ application to bring a dog onto the scheme – where applicants allege committee decision was unreasonable – whether to grant interim order to allow dog to be brought onto the scheme pending further or final order. Act, s 279
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 4 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.