Strata scheme CTS 10669
CTS 10669 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 2 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Elevated- $25,000
Serious building-defect rectification
Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $3,700
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 2 matters.
Litigation · 2 matters
Rata Nui [2023] QBCCMCmr 415
Other QBCCMCmr 24 October 2023
INTERIM ORDER – whether interim orders should be granted in the circumstances. Act, s279(1)
Rata Nui [2023] QBCCMCmr 117
Building defects QBCCMCmr 21 March 2023
MAINTENANCE UNDER BUILDING FORMAT PLAN – whether the body corporate breached its maintenance obligations because lot balconies leaked, notwithstanding that the balconies may have been constructed without waterproof membranes; whether the body corporate must fix the balconies, including by installing waterproof membranes and retiling; whether the body corporate must reimburse money spent by owners attempting to rectify the balconies. PROPERTY DAMAGE – whether the body corporate must repair the damage to a lot caused by the leaking balconies. JURISDICTION – whether it is beyond the jurisdiction of an adjudicator to determine the liability of a body corporate for losses beyond those contemplated by section 281 of the Act. Act, ss 20, 94(2), 100(5), 276(1)(a)-(b), 280, 281; Standard Module, ss 180(2)&(5), 201(5), 211(3); Land Titles Act 1994, ss 48C & 49C(4).
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 2 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.