Strata scheme CTS 10789
CTS 10789 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 3 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $4,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters.
Litigation · 3 matters
High Noon [2024] QBCCMCmr 172
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 9 May 2024
MAINTENANCE – whether the body corporate has undertaken adequate termite prevention measures –Act, ss 152, 276; Standard Module, s 180. REASONABLENESS - Section 94(2) Act - requirement of body corporate to act reasonably in carrying out its statutory functions – adequacy of termite control measures implemented by the body corporate.
High Noon [2023] QBCCMCmr 133
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 24 March 2023
COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT STATEMENT; EXCLUSIVE USE BY-LAW – where the body corporate recorded a community management statement that allocated areas of common property for the exclusive use of two lots without the authorisation of the body corporate; whether a new community management statement should be recorded that removes that allocation. Act, s 62.
High Noon [2022] QBCCMCmr 213
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 7 June 2022
APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – whether the body corporate should be prevented from further spending on attempts to correct an unauthorised allocation of common property for the exclusive use of two lots pending a final decision as to whether a new community management statement must be recorded to correct the anomaly. Act, ss 62(2)&(3)(a), 94(1)(a), 279(1); Standard Module, ss 160, 162(2), 172.
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 3 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.