Strata scheme CTS 10945
CTS 10945 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 4 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Elevated- $25,000
Serious building-defect rectification
Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $5,000
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 4 matters.
Litigation · 4 matters
Villas Ten [2023] QBCCMCmr 346
By-laws QBCCMCmr 1 September 2023
BY-LAWS – where the applicant claims his neighbours’ garden contravenes a by-law and their air conditioner breaches body corporate policy; whether the body corporate must enforce the by-laws. Act, ss 94(1)(b), 182.
Villas Ten [2022] QBCCMCmr 244
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 29 June 2022
Whether approval is required for installation of security cameras on common property. Act, ss 94(2), 167; Standard Module, s 187
Villas Ten [2021] QBCCMCmr 156
Building defects QBCCMCmr 30 March 2021
MAINTENANCE – whether the body corporate is responsible for repairing termite damage to a lot, and should meet the costs of repair – whether the body corporate undertook adequate termite prevention measures – whether the body corporate is responsible for waterproofing a balcony and should pay the costs of remediation. Act, ss 94, 100(5), 276(1), 281(1); Standard Module, ss 180, 221.
Villas Ten [2020] QBCCMCmr 123
Costs and procedure QBCCMCmr 10 March 2020
COSTS – where the body corporate did not make a reasonable attempt to participate in conciliation –whether costs should be awarded. Act, s 280(2)
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 4 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.