Strata scheme CTS 11128
CTS 11128 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 4 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Elevated- $25,000
Serious building-defect rectification
Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $5,000
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 4 matters.
Litigation · 4 matters
Noosa Shores [2025] QBCCMCmr 14
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 17 January 2025
BY-LAWS – whether two cameras installed within a lot and capturing common property should be removed because they contravene by-laws regulating nuisance and changes to the external appearance of the lot. Act, ss 94(2), 100(5), 184, 270(1)(c),(3)&(4), 276(1).
Noosa Shores [2024] QBCCMCmr 471
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 17 December 2024
REASONABLENESS; GENERAL MEETING MOTIONS – The body corporate failed to take any action with respect to a privacy screen that was removed from a lot balcony, affecting the privacy and amenity of the applicant’s neighbouring lot. A general meeting motion to reinstate the screen was voted down. The applicants argue the body corporate acted unreasonably, beyond its statutory functions, and it should reinstate the screen. Act, ss 94(1)(a), 94(2); Land Title Act 1994, ss 48C, 49C(4).
Noosa Shores [2023] QBCCMCmr 382
By-laws QBCCMCmr 4 October 2023
ANIMAL BY-LAW – where the applicant’s representative sought approval to bring a dog when holidaying in their lot – where approval was refused - whether the committee acted reasonably – what conditions of approval would be appropriate. Act, ss 94(2), 100(5)
Noosa Shores [2022] QBCCMCmr 452
Other QBCCMCmr 14 December 2022
INTERIM ORDER – whether an interim order is warranted. Act, s 279
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 4 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.