Strata scheme CTS 11441
CTS 11441 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 4 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $5,000
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 4 matters.
Litigation · 4 matters
Bilinga Gardens [2025] QBCCMCmr 26
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 29 January 2025
IMPROVEMENT TO COMMON PROPERTY – where owner’s air-conditioner installed on common property was not properly authorised – whether air-conditioner should be removed. Act, s94; Standard Module, s187
Bilinga Gardens [2025] QBCCMCmr 27
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 29 January 2025
IMPROVEMENT TO COMMON PROPERTY – where owner sought retrospective approval for an air-conditioner installed on common property subject to conditions including relocation of the condenser – whether the motion at general meeting was incorrectly ruled out of order – whether the body corporate acted unreasonably – whether the motion should be deemed carried. Act, ss 94, 100; Standard Module, ss 98, 187
Bilinga Gardens [2024] QBCCMCmr 314
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 29 August 2024
INTERIM ORDER – where owner seeks retrospective approval for air-conditioner installed on common property – where body corporate is also considering motion to remove the air-conditioner - whether interim order is warranted to restrain the body corporate from removing the air-conditioner pending final orders. Act, s279(1)
Bilinga Gardens [2024] QBCCMCmr 110
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 22 March 2024
IMPROVEMENT TO COMMON PROPERTY; GENERAL MEETING RESOLUTION, REASONABLENESS – The applicants installed air conditioning infrastructure on common property with the written authorisation of the committee chair but without the authority of a body corporate resolution. They submitted a motion seeking retrospective approval to a general meeting but it failed to pass. Whether the body corporate has acquiesced to the infrastructure, it benefits from a statutory easement, or the body corporate acted unreasonably when refusing to grant retrospective approval. Whether the motion should be deemed carried. Act, ss 35(1), 94(1)(a)&(2), 97, 280; Standard Module, ss 187; Land Title Act 1994, ss 48C(1), 49C(4), 115O(1).
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 4 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.