Strata scheme CTS 12681
CTS 12681 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 4 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $5,000
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 4 matters.
Litigation · 4 matters
La Porte D'Or [2024] QBCCMCmr 129
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 2 April 2024
GENERAL MEETING PROCEDURES – whether motions correctly prepared where the relevant limit for major spending exceeded – whether other irregularities in preparation of voting papers and return of votes – strict requirement to comply with control of spending provisions – circumstances in which noncompliance with meeting procedures may not lead to resolutions being invalidated Standard Module, ss 87, 173
La Porte D'Or [2021] QBCCMCmr 566
Other QBCCMCmr 8 December 2021
Whether body corporate was entitled to withhold owner’s share of compensation proceeds. Act, ss 270(1)(c), 280(1); Acquisition of Land Act 1967 Qld, s18(10)(b)
La Porte D'Or [2021] QBCCMCmr 431
Other QBCCMCmr 13 September 2021
Distribution of compensation proceeds, whether in accordance with Acquisition of Land Act 1967 (Qld). Acquisition of Land Act 1967 (Qld), ss12, 18; Standard Module, ss52(1)(d), 162(2).
La Porte D'Or [2021] QBCCMCmr 226
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 11 May 2021
COMMITTEE RESOLUTION; AGM RESOLUTION – whether a general meeting motion proposing expenditure on maintenance above the relevant limit for major spending must give owners 2 quotations both for the substantive work and for a project manager to oversee it; whether there is any utility to orders after the AGM has been held and the disputed motion has failed. Standard Module, s 173.
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 4 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.