← Back to the full dossier
StrataAuditor Public-record dossier

Strata scheme CTS 1498

CTS 1498 Queensland

Verdict

Public record: 4 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.

Cost exposure

Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.

Elevated
Good case $8,600 per lot
Expected $30,000 per lot
Worst case $98,900 per lot
  • Serious building-defect rectification

    Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.

    $25,000
  • Tribunal and legal costs

    Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 4 matters.

    $5,000

Litigation · 4 matters

  • Pioneer Court [2021] QBCCMCmr 515

    By-laws QBCCMCmr 16 November 2021

    BODY CORPORATE DEBT – whether an amount allegedly owed to the body corporate under a by-law that permits the body corporate to recover certain expenses from owners is a body corporate debt; whether the by-law is valid; whether the applicant can be prevented from voting, nominating someone for election to the committee, or standing for election to the committee; whether the dispute is a debt dispute and therefore beyond the jurisdiction of an adjudicator; whether the applicant is entitled to reimbursement of his application fee. Act, ss 180(1) & (6), 229A, 280; Small Schemes Module, ss 11, 50(2).

  • Pioneer Court [2021] QBCCMCmr 439

    Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 16 September 2021

    BY-LAWS – whether a by-law applies in the circumstances; whether the Body Corporate has power to enforce particular by-laws. MAINTENANCE – OBLIGATION TO MAINTAIN ACCESS TO LOT – whether body corporate entitled to access to lot to perform maintenance - BCCMA, s 163. REASONABLENESS - BCCMA, s 94. STATUTORY EASEMENTS FOR UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE- s 115O Land Title Act

  • Pioneer Court [2021] QBCCMCmr 128

    Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 19 March 2021

    APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – whether the body corporate should be prevented from implementing the decisions of its forthcoming annual general meeting until a decision can be made about whether an owner’s vote and committee nomination were incorrectly excluded on the basis that he owes the body corporate a debt. Act, ss 31, 59(2)(b), 229A, 279; Small Schemes Module, ss 11(3), 50(2).

  • Pioneer Court [2021] QBCCMCmr 14

    Building defects QBCCMCmr 13 January 2021

    EGM RESOLUTIONS – whether various unsuccessful EGM motions should be deemed passed; whether it was unreasonable to oppose a motion to grant exclusive use of courtyards because the dissenting owner would not benefit from them; whether the external paintwork at the scheme is not in good condition and requires repainting; whether owners should pay to remedy any defects around their lots prior to repainting; whether committee members should reimburse the body corporate for paint because they did not repaint the scheme to a professional standard; whether a resolution to install a security gate should be revoked after the gate has been installed due to various alleged defects with the authorising motion or problems with the operation of the gate; whether the body corporate should reimburse owners the cost of re-running common property water pipes in a shared wall; whether an owner could construct a balcony on common property without the authority of a resolution without dissent; whether it was unreasonable to refuse to engage a solicitor to seek reimbursement from a company that damaged the scheme roof and was engaged by the committee despite a conflict of interest. Act, ss 20, 21(1), 35(1), 62(2), 94(2), 163, 170, 177(1), 238(1)(a); Small Schemes Module, ss 45(2), 93, 95(2)(a)(i), 98, 108; Land Title Act 1994, ss 48C, 49C(4).

Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.

Evidence ledger

Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.

Evidence ledger: what was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when it was last checked.
CheckedFoundMatchLast checked
Registry and parcelLand registryStub onlyNot harvested here yet
Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reportingNot yet checkedNot matchedNot harvested here yet
Litigation: NCAT and courts4 mattersDirectNot harvested here yet
Levies and financialsNot yet checkedNot matchedNot in the public record
Defects and building-work ordersOutside current coverageNot matchedNot harvested here yet
Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigatedNot on the public record, and no registry entry for this schemeNot matchedNever in the public record

What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.

Compiled by StrataAuditor from Queensland titles register and the relevant licence registers. Litigation from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. Records only, as published; unknowns are shown as unknowns.

Coverage caveat: this reflects only what is on the public record for Queensland at the time of generation. An empty matters or orders count is not a clean bill: fund balances, current levies, minutes, and defects not yet litigated are never on the public record. Obtain the strata report before you bid.

Public-record summary, not legal or financial advice.

Generated 2 July 2026 · StrataAuditor

strataauditor.com/building/qld:CTS1498