Strata scheme CTS 15228
CTS 15228 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 3 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $4,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters.
Litigation · 3 matters
Admiralty Gardens [2023] QBCCMCmr 20
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 23 January 2023
Section 35 of the Act - general right of lot owners to use common property. Whether presence of personal property on common property creates an obstruction or requires a grant of exclusive use Whether the body corporate has acted reasonably. Act, ss 94, 152; Small Schemes Module, s 99, 106.
Admiralty Gardens [2022] QBCCMCmr 227
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 16 June 2022
Whether the body corporate has complied with its statutory maintenance obligations; whether the body corporate has acted reasonably. Act, ss 94, 152; Small Schemes Module, s 99.
Admiralty Gardens [2021] QBCCMCmr 461
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 7 October 2021
BY-LAWS – whether a screen erected with the permission of the body corporate on an area of common property used for manoeuvring vehicles is creating an obstruction contrary to the by-laws; whether the body corporate must enforce the relevant by-law against the owners who installed the screen; whether the resolution approving the screen should be enforced or is invalid; whether the screen should be removed; whether the respondent should reimburse the applicant’s conciliation and adjudication application fees. Act, ss 94(1)(b), 101(2), 182, 280; Small Schemes Module, ss 17(1)(d), 46(1)(a)(i), 55.
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 3 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.