Strata scheme CTS 15441
CTS 15441 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 8 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $6,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 8 matters.
Litigation · 8 matters
Winchcombe Place [2024] QBCCMCmr 321
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 3 September 2024
COMMITTEE MOTION - whether the committee could prevent the use of power outlets on common property to charge electric vehicles – whether the decision was a restricted issue for the committee. Act, s 180; Standard Module, s 52(1)
Winchcombe Place [2024] QBCCMCmr 176
Other QBCCMCmr 13 May 2024
RECORDS – where the body corporate refused to give the applicant the body corporate roll – whether the body corporate breached its obligation to provide access to records – whether the roll must be supplied. Act, s 205
Winchcombe Place [2023] QBCCMCmr 139
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 19 March 2023
COMMON PROPERTY – RESOLUTION WITHOUT DISSENT – REASONABLENESS – where an earlier adjudicator’s decision found that a lot’s renovations resulted in the movement of an external boundary wall into common property which effectively amalgamated common property into the lot – where there was no body corporate decision approving a disposition and transfer of title of common property to the lot – where the earlier adjudicator ordered the owner to reinstate the lot wall unless a resolution without dissent was passed to allow the amalgamation of the common property into the lot – where the motion requiring the resolution without dissent failed to pass – whether opposition to the motion was unreasonable such that it can be deemed to have passed without dissent. Act, ss 94(2), 276(1)(b), Schedule 5, Item 10.
Winchcombe Place [2022] QBCCMCmr 313
Other QBCCMCmr 19 August 2022
INTERIM ORDER – whether to make an interim order. Act, s 279
Winchcombe Place [2022] QBCCMCmr 67
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 22 February 2022
Whether the removal of existing masonry boundary wall and erection of new wall in an exclusive use area was a disposal of an interest in common property - whether the works could be approved by simple majority- whether approval by resolution without dissent was required Body Corporate and Community Management Act Land Titles Act ss 10, 41A\_,\_ 41B and 41C Body Corporate and Community Management (Standard Module) 2020 s 184 Katsikalis v Body Corporate for The Centre [[2009] QCA 77](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCA/2009/77.html "View Case") Diane [[2016] QBCCMCmr 585](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2016/585.html "View Case") Dansur v Body Corporate for Cairns Aquarius [[2022] QCATA 15](/cgi-bin/LawCite?cit=%5b2022%5d%20QCATA%2015 "View LawCiteRecord")
Winchcombe Place [2021] QBCCMCmr 451
Other QBCCMCmr 29 September 2021
INTERIM ORDER – Application for interim order– whether warranted in circumstances\_.\_ SDW2 Pty Ltd v JLF Corporation Pty Ltd [[2017] QSC 001](/cgi-bin/LawCite?cit=%5b2017%5d%20QSC%20001 "View LawCiteRecord") ABC v O’Neill [[2006] HCA 46](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/46.html "View Case") Act, ss 276, 279. Standard Module, ss 184, 187
Winchcombe Place [2021] QBCCMCmr 432
Other QBCCMCmr 14 September 2021
Winchcombe Place [[2021] QBCCMCmr 432](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2021/432.html "View Case") Lex and Wendy McQueen (applicant) The Body Corporate for Wichcombe Place (1st respondent) Ms. Kathryn Draper (2nd respondent) All owners (affected persons) Winchcombe Place CTS 15441 Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997 (Qld) (Act), sections 227and 229(3)(a) Body Corporate and Community Management (Standard Module) Regulation 2020 (Standard Module) 1041-2021 14 September 2021 R Miskinis, Adjudicator INTERIM ORDER - Application for interim order- whether warranted in circumstances. SDW2 Pty Ltd v JLF Corporation Pty Ltd [[2017] QSC 001](/cgi-bin/LawCite?cit=%5b2017%5d%20QSC%20001 "View LawCiteRecord") ABC v O'Neill [[2006] HCA 46](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/46.html "View Case") Act, ss 276, 279. Standard Module, ss 164, 184
Winchcombe Place [2020] QBCCMCmr 2
By-laws QBCCMCmr 3 January 2020
ANIMAL BY-LAW – whether the body corporate failed to act reasonably in relation to the applicant’s requests to have two dogs at her lot. Act, ss 94(2),100(5), 245
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 8 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.