Strata scheme CTS 15920
CTS 15920 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 3 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $4,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters.
Litigation · 3 matters
Villa San Michele [2022] QBCCMCmr 238
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 27 June 2022
MOTION TO TERMINATE CARETAKING AND MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT – REASONABLENESS - whether the body corporate should be prevented from putting into effect a resolution from an annual general meeting to terminate the caretaking and management agreement held by a company of which the applicants are directors – whether there is jurisdiction to determine the matter Act, ss 94(2), 149(B), 276(1), 279(1). S 101 Commercial Module Regulation 2020
Villa San Michele [2022] QBCCMCmr 125
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 4 April 2022
APPLICATION FOR AN INTERIM ORDER – whether the body corporate should be prevented from putting into effect a resolution from an annual general meeting to terminate the caretaking and management agreement held by a company of which the applicants are directors – whether there is jurisdiction to determine the matter – whether the nature or urgency of the circumstances require an order to be made – whether there are serious questions of law and the balance of convenience favours the case advanced by the applicants. Act, ss 94(2), 149(B), 276(1), 279(1).
Villa San Michele [2021] QBCCMCmr 162
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 1 April 2021
APPLICATION FOR AN INTERIM ORDER – whether the body corporate should be prevented from putting into effect a resolution from an annual general meeting to terminate the caretaking and management agreement held by a company of which the applicants are directors – whether there is jurisdiction to determine the matter – whether the nature or urgency of the circumstances require an order to be made – whether there are serious questions of law and the balance of convenience favours the case advanced by the applicants. Act, ss 94(2), 149(B), 276(1), 279(1).
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 3 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.