Strata scheme CTS 16291
CTS 16291 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 4 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $5,000
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 4 matters.
Litigation · 4 matters
Castleview [2023] QBCCMCmr 183
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 9 May 2023
AGM RESOLUTION; IMPROVEMENT TO COMMON PROPERTY – whether the body corporate acted unreasonably when resolving to install a roof access hatch on common property just outside the applicant’s lot. Act, ss 94(2), 163.
Castleview [2022] QBCCMCmr 404
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 10 November 2022
IMPROVEMENT TO COMMON PROPERTY – whether a committee resolution to install a roof access hatch on common property was invalid due to the value of the improvement; whether the committee acted unreasonably when passing the resolution. Act, s 100(5); Standard Module, ss 52(1)(d), 186.
Castleview [2022] QBCCMCmr 151
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 22 April 2022
APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – whether the body corporate should be prevented from acting upon an ordinary resolution to install a roof access hatch on common property until it can be decided whether the resolution is contrary to an earlier interim order or whether the body corporate acted unreasonably when passing the resolution. Act, ss 94(2), 279(1); Standard Module, s 186.
Castleview [2022] QBCCMCmr 75
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 24 February 2022
APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – whether the body corporate should be prevented from installing a roof hatch upon common property until it can be determined whether the improvement has been properly authorised. Act, ss 100, 279(1); Standard Module, ss 52(1)(d), 186.
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 4 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.