Strata scheme CTS 16707
CTS 16707 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 3 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $4,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters.
Litigation · 3 matters
Carmel by the Sea [2022] QBCCMCmr 261
Other QBCCMCmr 12 July 2022
EXCLUSIVE USE – WHERE IMPROVEMENTS MADE TO EXCLUSIVE USE AREA- RATIFICATION Act, ss 159, 270, 276; Standard Module, ss 187, 193
Carmel by the Sea [2021] QBCCMCmr 29
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 20 January 2021
APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – whether an interim order should be made to prevent the body corporate from holding its AGM and conducting a committee election before an EGM requested by owners can consider motions to remove and replace the current committee. Act, s 279(1); Standard Module, ss 13(1), 33(2)(f), 37, 66, 67, 69(1)(b).
Carmel By The Sea [2020] QBCCMCmr 147
By-laws QBCCMCmr 25 March 2020
BY-LAWS – whether the body corporate committee acted reasonably when refusing permission for owners’ window tinting on the basis that it was too dark at a scheme with a variety of unapproved tinting in various shades; whether those owners should be ordered to remove the tint and compensate the body corporate for their “vexatious attitude”; whether the application is vexatious and the body corporate should compensate the respondents for costs arising from the application. Act, ss 100(5), 270.
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 3 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.