Strata scheme CTS 16924
CTS 16924 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 2 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Elevated- $25,000
Serious building-defect rectification
Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $3,700
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 2 matters.
Litigation · 2 matters
Surfair Central Tower [2020] QBCCMCmr 131
Building defects QBCCMCmr 13 March 2020
MAINTENANCE OF EXCLUSIVE USE AREA – whether the body corporate is responsible for the maintenance of an exclusive use area, including improvements that may have been made by a former owner and a waterproof membrane that was damaged by those improvements. Whether the body corporate can validly resolve to relocate the physical features that define the boundaries of the exclusive use area in the community management statement without also changing the community management statement. BODY CORPORATE RECORDS – whether the body corporate is obliged to inform an owner of the location of leaks mentioned in a quotation obtained on the body corporate’s behalf, or to advise whether each leak is the body corporate’s responsibility or not. BUDGETS – whether the body corporate is obliged to obtain budgetary approval at a general meeting before putting motions proposing work to a rooftop exclusive use area. Act, ss 62, 205, 281; Accommodation Module, ss 137, 139(2), 157, 162, 171, 172.
Surfair Central Tower [2020] QBCCMCmr 28
Levies and contributions QBCCMCmr 21 January 2020
Whether an interim order is necessary to require the withdrawal of notices of interim contributions. Act, ss 101, 279; Accommodation Module, s 93
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 2 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.