Strata scheme CTS 17354
CTS 17354 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 2 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $3,700
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 2 matters.
Litigation · 2 matters
A.M.T. Centre [2022] QBCCMCmr 95
By-laws QBCCMCmr 15 March 2022
GENERAL MEETING MOTION – whether a motion proposed to record a new community management to replace an exclusive use by-law about car parking – where the motion failed to achieve a resolution without dissent - whether dissenting votes were unreasonable in the circumstances - whether the motion should be deemed passed Act, s 276(1), Schedule 5, Item 10
A.M.T. Centre [2021] QBCCMCmr 23
Levies and contributions QBCCMCmr 18 January 2021
BODY CORPORATE DEBT – COMMITTEE – CODE OF CONDUCT FOR VOTING COMMITTEE MEMBER – where AGM chair alleged owner owed more contributions that had been levied – where lot owner declared by chair to be unfinancial – where owner’s votes not counted – meaning of body corporate debt – whether to order that motions were passed – where lot owner and owner’s nominee elected to committee at AGM – where EGM motion passed to remove lot owner and nominee from committee – whether to invalidate EGM motion – where motions called for BCM to provide information to the Body Corporate – whether motions invalid for seeking body corporate records – where owner seeks order to issue notice for breach of code of conduct for committee voting members – whether to order body corporate issue breach notice Standard Module, s 34
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 2 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.