Strata scheme CTS 17653
CTS 17653 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 4 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $5,000
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 4 matters.
Litigation · 4 matters
Paradise Island Apartments [2024] QBCCMCmr 116
Other QBCCMCmr 25 March 2024
MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE – where the applicant seeks body corporate consent to apply for approval to change the use of its lot – where the applicant does not agree with the body corporate’s conditions for giving consent – whether the body corporate failed to act reasonably. Act, ss 94, 100
Paradise Island Apartments [2022] QBCCMCmr 315
By-laws QBCCMCmr 23 August 2022
AGM RESOLUTION – whether a body corporate decision to record new by-laws that disadvantaged some lot owners was invalid and the old by-laws should be reinstated; whether the body corporate breached its fiduciary duty or acted unreasonably. Act, ss 62(3), 94(2); Accommodation Module, s 80(7).
Paradise Island Apartments [2022] QBCCMCmr 316
By-laws QBCCMCmr 23 August 2022
AGM RESOLUTION – whether a body corporate decision to record new by-laws that disadvantaged some lot owners was invalid and the old by-laws should be reinstated; whether the body corporate breached its fiduciary duty or acted unreasonably. Act, ss 62(3), 94(2); Accommodation Module, s 80(7).
Paradise Island Apartments [2021] QBCCMCmr 88
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 25 February 2021
IMPROVEMENTS TO COMMON PROPERTY – where the respondent has installed a storage shed in the basement car park area – whether the installation was contrary to the legislation and the by-laws - whether the respondent should be required to remove the storage shed or replace it with one that complies with the by-laws. Accommodation Module, ss 162, 172
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 4 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.