Strata scheme CTS 18705
CTS 18705 · Registration date not recorded · Lot count not recorded · Queensland checked 30 June 2026
Public record: 14 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
- 14 tribunal or court matters, the most serious about repairs and common property
- $6,300 indicative cost exposure per lot, moderate band
The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a strata records search before you bid.
-
Public record checked
Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
- Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a strata records search if you do not have it yet.
- Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
-
Decide
Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.
Risk read
What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a strata records search before you bid.
-
14 litigation matters on record
Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.
Cost exposure
Moderate exposureAn indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.
| Driver | Good | Expected | Worst |
|---|---|---|---|
Tribunal and legal costs 14 tribunal or court matters on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 14 matters. | $700 | $6,300 | $24,900 |
| Total per lot | $700 | $6,300 | $24,900 |
Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.
Questions to ask before you bid
- 1
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
- 2
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
- 3
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?
Ask about this building
Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.
Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 14 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.
Building record
Strata plan CTS 18705 is on the register.
Location not mapped for this scheme yet. Map coverage is New South Wales today. Open the full map.
Litigation
- Ocean Resort Village (No 1) [2022] QBCCMCmr 331
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 6 September 2022
UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE - where electrical infrastructure servicing all lots and common property is located within the boundaries of a lot – where there has been a dispute about the ownership, location, and responsibility for the infrastructure - whether there has been interference with utility services by preventing access to the infrastructure. Act, ss 20, 163, 166, 331(3)(a); Standard Module, s 180
- Ocean Resort Village (No 1) [2022] QBCCMCmr 229
Other QBCCMCmr 17 June 2022
ACCESS TO INFRASTRUCTURE – where electrical infrastructure for the scheme is located on the lot occupied by the respondents – where the applicants’ lots have lost power supply – where access to the electrical infrastructure is sought to enable the restoration of power – whether the respondents should be required to provide access. Act, ss 20, 166, 243A
- Ocean Resort Village (No 1) [2022] QBCCMCmr 28
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 28 January 2022
GENERAL MEETINGS – whether two general meetings were valid – which version of the minutes is correct – which lots were financial - who was eligible to vote – who was eligible to be appointed to the committee – whether an adjudicator has jurisdiction to decide the dispute. Act, s 229A
- Ocean Resort Village (No 1) [2022] QBCCMCmr 29
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 28 January 2022
GENERAL MEETINGS – whether two general meetings were valid – which version of the minutes is correct – which lots were financial - who was eligible to vote – who was eligible to be appointed to the committee – whether an adjudicator has jurisdiction to decide the dispute. Act, s 229A
- Ocean Resort Village (No 1) [2021] QBCCMCmr 543
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 29 November 2021
GENERAL MEETING MOTION – whether a motion should be invalidated.
- Ocean Resort Village (No 1) [2021] QBCCMCmr 358
Other QBCCMCmr 21 July 2021
EASEMENTS – whether the electricity meters within the respondent’s lot are subject to an easement in favour of the other lots; whether the easement gives the other owners the right to enter the respondent’s lot to read their meters. Act, ss 20(1), 331(3)(b); Standard Module, s 187; Building Units and Group Titles Act 1980, ss 17, 18.
- Ocean Resort Village (No 1) [2021] QBCCMCmr 248
Other QBCCMCmr 21 May 2021
INTERIM ORDER – whether an interim order is warranted. Act, s 279
- Ocean Resort Village (No 1) [2021] QBCCMCmr 159
Other QBCCMCmr 30 March 2021
INTERIM ORDER – whether an interim order is warranted. Act, s 279
- Ocean Resort Village (No 1) [2021] QBCCMCmr 16
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 13 January 2021
ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING – whether a body corporate annual general meeting will be invalid just because it will be held outside the prescribed legislative time frame. Standard Module, s 66.
- Ocean Resort Village (No 1) [2020] QBCCMCmr 99
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 27 February 2020
GENERAL MEETING – whether a voting result may be changed after the meeting – whether a conspiracy existed to produce a particular voting outcome – whether a body corporate manager acted with bias in favour of some lot owners. Act, ss 269(3)(b), 269(3)(c); Standard Module, ss 69, 76(2)(iii), 73(1)(a), 93(1), 93(2), 93(3), 96(1), 114(1), 114(2).
- Ocean Resort Village (No 1) [2020] QBCCMCmr 98
Other QBCCMCmr 26 February 2020
INTERIM ORDER – Application for interim order– whether warranted in circumstances\_.\_ SDW2 Pty Ltd v JLF Corporation Pty Ltd [[2017] QSC 001](/cgi-bin/LawCite?cit=%5b2017%5d%20QSC%20001 "View LawCiteRecord") ABC v Lenah Game Meats (2001) 208 CLR 199 Act, s 279
- Ocean Resort Village (No 1) [2020] QBCCMCmr 71
Other QBCCMCmr 14 February 2020
RECORDS –Obligation of the body corporate to provide access to records. Act, ss 204, 205; Standard Module ss 203 – 205
- Lumen [2020] QBCCMCmr 61
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 12 February 2020
POWER OF ADJUDICATOR TO MAKE ORDERS- Section 276 Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997 WHEN ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING MUST BE CALLED –section 64 Body Corporate and Community Management (Accommodation Module) Regulation 2008
- Ocean Resort Village (No 1) [2020] QBCCMCmr 49
Other QBCCMCmr 4 February 2020
ADMINISTRATOR – where applicant alleges financial mismanagement by committee – where new committee subsequently elected – where no evidence new committee cannot address financial issues – whether to appoint administrator. Act, s 301
Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 14 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.
Deep report · coming soon
On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.