Strata scheme CTS 19631
CTS 19631 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 3 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $4,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters.
Litigation · 3 matters
Jacaranda Gardens [2025] QBCCMCmr 24
By-laws QBCCMCmr 24 January 2025
BY-LAWS – where the applicant alleges the owner of Lot 28 is breaching the scheme’s by-laws – whether an order that the body corporate enforce the by-laws is warranted in the circumstances. Act, ss 94, 100, 182, 183, 185, 280; Standard Module, s 211
Jacaranda Gardens [2023] QBCCMCmr 337
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 29 August 2023
IMPROVEMENT TO COMMON PROPERTY – whether the body corporate acted reasonably in resolving to remove trees on common property. Act, ss 94(2), 100(5); Accommodation Module, ss 162, 163
Jacaranda Gardens [2022] QBCCMCmr 363
Other QBCCMCmr 4 October 2022
INTERIM ORDER – whether an interim order is necessary because of the nature or urgency of the circumstances to which the application relates. REFEREE POWERS – whether Referee can be satisfied that an application raises a serious legal question and the balance of convenience between the parties justifies injunctive relief. SDW2 Pty Ltd v JLF Corporation Pty Ltd [[2017] QSC 001](/cgi-bin/LawCite?cit=%5b2017%5d%20QSC%20001 "View LawCiteRecord") Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill [[2006] HCA 46](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/46.html "View Case") Act, s 279.
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 3 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.