Strata scheme CTS 20078
CTS 20078 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 3 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $4,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters.
Litigation · 3 matters
Central Heights [2024] QBCCMCmr 359
Other QBCCMCmr 30 September 2024
COMMITTEE DECISION – REASONABLENESS – The applicant lot owner required and received committee approval to install CCTV system on their lot. The applicant later sought and was denied approval to move the cameras to a different location on the lot. The applicant’s use of CCTV had previously raised privacy concerns for neighbours. The committee denied approval to move the cameras due to privacy concerns, but did not seek to negotiate suitable conditions of approval with the applicant. Should committee approval should be deemed to be given? Act, s 100(5)
Central Heights [2023] QBCCMCmr 402
By-laws QBCCMCmr 18 October 2023
NUISANCE – BY-LAWS - whether the respondent is causing a nuisance or an unreasonable interference by installing and using security cameras on his lot – whether he has breached the by-laws - whether the cameras should be removed. Act, s 167
Central Heights [2023] QBCCMCmr 130
By-laws QBCCMCmr 23 March 2023
INTERIM ORDERS – whether interim orders are warranted in view of the alleged breaches of the by-laws and the Act. Act, ss 167, 185, 186 and 279
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 3 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.