Strata scheme CTS 20606
CTS 20606 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 3 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $4,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters.
Litigation · 3 matters
Robina Lakes Resort [2022] QBCCMCmr 6
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 10 January 2022
GENERAL MEETING MOTIONS – whether motions should be declared invalid- where motions originally contained an incorrect reference to body corporate manager but were amended at the AGM – Disclosure of insurance details at annual general meeting – requirements contained in section 186 Accommodation Module Act, ss 270, 276, Accommodation Module, ss 146,166, 167, 186
Robina Lakes Resort [2021] QBCCMCmr 400
Other QBCCMCmr 24 August 2021
INTERIM ORDER – Application for interim order– whether warranted in circumstances\_.\_ SDW2 Pty Ltd v JLF Corporation Pty Ltd [[2017] QSC 001](/cgi-bin/LawCite?cit=%5b2017%5d%20QSC%20001 "View LawCiteRecord") ABC v O’Neill [[2006] HCA 46](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/46.html "View Case") Act, ss 276, 279. Accommodation Module, ss 102, 142
Robina Lakes Resort [2020] QBCCMCmr 69
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 14 February 2020
AGM RESOLUTIONS – whether a statutory motion not to appoint an auditor passed by special resolution; whether an auditor should be independent of the body corporate; whether a motion to extend the caretaking service contractor’s engagement on the condition that the caretaker meet half of the body corporate’s legal fees should have included quotations for the legal work; whether a resolution to appoint a body corporate manager for two years was invalid because it conflicted with an earlier resolution to appoint a body corporate manager for one year; whether a motion to appoint a gardener was invalid because it did not state the cost; whether a resolution to record a new community management statement was invalid because it should have been a special resolution; whether the minutes of the meeting require correction. Act, ss 62(3)(a), 106; Accommodation Module, ss 10, 13, 94, 149, 150, 153.
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 3 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.