Strata scheme CTS 20926
CTS 20926 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 4 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $5,000
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 4 matters.
Litigation · 4 matters
Crystal Waters Permaculture Village [2024] QBCCMCmr 290
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 8 August 2024
GENERAL MEETING MOTIONS – where the body corporate resolved to employ an owner – whether previous resolutions affecting the position had been complied with – whether the motion conflicted with previous resolutions – whether the motion is valid. Act, ss 94, 100(5), 101(2), 242; Standard Module, ss 88, 116
Crystal Waters Permaculture Village [2022] QBCCMCmr 53
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 10 February 2022
GENERAL MEETING MOTIONS – where two motions submitted by the applicant did not pass – whether the body corporate decisions should be overturned – whether orders are warranted. Act, ss 20, 94, 169, 180; Standard Module, ss 180
Crystal Waters Permaculture Village [2022] QBCCMCmr 39
Other QBCCMCmr 3 February 2022
Whether an order should be made to change the financial year end date of the body corporate. Act, s 283
Crystal Waters Permaculture Village [2020] QBCCMCmr 169
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 3 April 2020
GENERAL MEETING – whether owners were given sufficient information when asked to approve a payment-in-kind scheme – whether a motion supporting the scheme should be voided. Act, ss 94(2), 100(5), 269(3).
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 4 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.