Strata scheme CTS 2398
CTS 2398 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 2 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $3,700
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 2 matters.
Litigation · 2 matters
The Loft [2024] QBCCMCmr 373
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 15 October 2024
GENERAL MEETING MOTION – The body corporate resolved by ordinary resolution to replace the roof. The applicant says the resolution should be deemed void because the new roof was an improvement requiring authorisation by special resolution, the contractor was not licensed for the work when submitting the quotation, the quotation was not sufficiently detailed, the contractor was not reputable, the motion authorised an “engagement” where a written contract was required, and the meeting was inquorate. Act, s 101B(3); Standard Module, ss 45, 58(6), 99, 100, 172(1)(a), 180(1), 186.
The Loft [2024] QBCCMCmr 193
Levies and contributions QBCCMCmr 24 May 2024
APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – where the body corporate resolved to engage a contractor to replace the roof and fund it by increasing contributions to the sinking fund; where the applicant says the body corporate committee lacked the power to enter a contract, the work should have been authorised by special resolution because it exceeds the ordinary resolution improvement range, and the contractor has contravened the QBCC Act; whether the body corporate should be prevented from giving effect to the resolution prior to final orders. Act, ss 95(1)(a), 276(1), 342; Standard Module, s 186.
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 2 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.