Strata scheme CTS 24386
CTS 24386 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 4 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $5,000
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 4 matters.
Litigation · 4 matters
Crown Towers [2024] QBCCMCmr 95
Costs and procedure QBCCMCmr 12 March 2024
JURISDICTION – meaning of dispute – whether committee for a body corporate has standing to bring application against that body corporate. Act, ss 227, 270, 276
Crown Towers [2023] QBCCMCmr 461
By-laws QBCCMCmr 24 November 2023
ANIMAL BY-LAW – whether the committee acted reasonably in refusing permission for applicant’s animal as required under by-laws – whether approval should be given for the animal. Act, ss 94(2), 100(5)
Crown Towers [2022] QBCCMCmr 220
Other QBCCMCmr 10 June 2022
Whether committee acted reasonably making a decision. Act, s 100(5)
Crown Towers [2021] QBCCMCmr 372
Other QBCCMCmr 6 August 2021
COMMITTEE DECISION – whether the committee should have approved a structure to enclose the applicant’s lot – whether the committee did not act reasonably – whether the committee made a decision – whether the matter is a ‘restricted issue’ – whether the committee placed too much weight on irrelevant considerations and not on relevant issues. Act, ss 94(1), 94(2), 100(1), 100(5), 252E(5); Accommodation Module 2008, ss 42(1), 162, 167(3); Commercial Module 2008, s 3(3).
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 4 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.