Strata scheme CTS 25221
CTS 25221 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 4 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $5,000
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 4 matters.
Litigation · 4 matters
Somerset Gardens [2026] QBCCMCmr 48
Other QBCCMCmr 20 February 2026
INTERIM ORDER – whether an interim order is warranted. Act, s 279
Somerset Gardens [2023] QBCCMCmr 335
By-laws QBCCMCmr 28 August 2023
GENERAL MEETING MOTIONS – whether motions that purported to direct the applicant’s conduct as committee chairperson were invalid. GENERAL MEETING PROCEDURES – whether general meeting minutes that failed to record various statements and procedural motions were not full and accurate and should be amended. BY-LAWS – whether a communication by-law is invalid because some terms are not defined, it conflicts with the body corporate’s contracts with service providers, it is at odds with the Act, or it diminishes owners’ ability to raise legitimate issues with the body corporate. Act, ss 59(2), 94(1), 95(1), 100(5), 180(1); Accommodation Module, ss 76, 83(1), 107.
Somerset Gardens [2023] QBCCMCmr 332
Other QBCCMCmr 25 August 2023
INTERIM ORDER – whether interim order is warranted. Act, s 279
Somerset Gardens [2021] QBCCMCmr 260
By-laws QBCCMCmr 28 May 2021
BY-LAW – where a motion to amend exclusive use by-laws failed to be passed as a resolution without dissent – whether the current by-laws are valid – whether the result of the motion should be overturned. Act, ss 163, 180
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 4 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.