Strata scheme CTS 28454
CTS 28454 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 3 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $4,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters.
Litigation · 3 matters
Metro [2022] QBCCMCmr 156
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 26 April 2022
Whether a body corporate or a body corporate committee acted reasonably, whether poll voting at a general meeting on a motion to be decided by ordinary resolution can be restricted; whether there is a dispute to be resolved. Act, ss 94, 100, 109, 276.
Metro [2022] QBCCMCmr 157
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 26 April 2022
Whether there is a dispute to be resolved about a contravention of the Act or the scheme’s community management statement or about the exercise of rights or powers, or the performance of duties, under the Act or the CMS; whether utility infrastructure is common property of the principal scheme; whether a subsidiary scheme body corporate is responsible to maintain utility infrastructure in good condition Act, ss 20, 276, 281; Body Corporate and Community Management (Standard Module) Regulation 2020, s 180; Body Corporate and Community Management (Accommodation Module) Regulation 2020, s 201.
Metro [2021] QBCCMCmr 502
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 1 November 2021
MAINTENANCE – whether the principal body corporate or the subsidiary body corporate is the ‘body corporate’ responsible for roofing membranes within lots within a subsidiary scheme Act s 18; Standard Module, s180; Accommodation Module s170
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 3 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.