Strata scheme CTS 28814
CTS 28814 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 3 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $4,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters.
Litigation · 3 matters
Kensington Gate [2023] QBCCMCmr 439
Costs and procedure QBCCMCmr 13 November 2023
BODY CORPORATE RECORDS – where body corporate provided lot owner with copies of body corporate records, whether body corporate had valid basis for invoicing lot owner – whether committee for body corporate acted reasonably and in compliance with code of conduct in its dealings with lot owner about the records and invoice – whether lot owner should be reimbursed for expenses and costs of conciliation and adjudication applications. Act, ss 205, 252E(5)
Kensington Gate [2021] QBCCMCmr 458
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 5 October 2021
GENERAL MEETING MOTIONS – whether committee explanatory material improperly affected the outcome of voting on a motion submitted by the applicant – whether two other motions submitted by the applicant were incorrectly ruled out order – whether the motions should be reconsidered by the body corporate – whether there are issues with the body corporate’s expenditure on building investigations and work. Act, s 94(2); Accommodation Module 2020, ss 80, 88, 162
Kensington Gate [2020] QBCCMCmr 154
Other QBCCMCmr 26 March 2020
RECORDS – whether the body corporate failed to provide body corporate records – whether the records must be supplied. Act, s 205; Accommodation Module, s 203
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 3 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.