Strata scheme CTS 28937
CTS 28937 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 4 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $5,000
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 4 matters.
Litigation · 4 matters
Poinciana Vistas [2023] QBCCMCmr 457
By-laws QBCCMCmr 20 November 2023
GENERAL MEETING MOTION / COMMITTEE MOTION / REASONABLENESS – where the scheme’s by-laws require approval from the body corporate to change external colours of any building located on a lot – where the applicant sought permission from the body corporate to change certain external colours but approval was refused – whether the body corporate has acted unreasonably. Act, ss 94, 100; Standard Module, ss 116
Poinciana Vistas [2023] QBCCMCmr 408
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 20 October 2023
COMMITTEE MOTIONS – where the applicants installed a concrete path on common property – where the committee passed resolutions about the path – whether orders about the resolutions are warranted. Act, ss 94(2), 100(5); Standard Module, s 187
Poinciana Vistas [2023] QBCCMCmr 27
Other QBCCMCmr 27 January 2023
INTERIM ORDER – whether an interim order is warranted. Act, s 279
Poinciana Vistas [2022] QBCCMCmr 71
Other QBCCMCmr 22 February 2022
ACCESS TO RECORDS – where the applicant sought CCTV footage –whether the body corporate has failed to provide access to records. Act, s 205; Standard Module, ss 231, 232
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 4 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.