Strata scheme CTS 29558
CTS 29558 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 3 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $4,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters.
Litigation · 3 matters
Expansion Place [2024] QBCCMCmr 398
Other QBCCMCmr 1 November 2024
INTERIM ORDER – whether an interim order is warranted Act, s 279
Expansion Place [2023] QBCCMCmr 78
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 24 February 2023
DISPOSAL OF COMMON PROPERTY – where an owner marked out an additional parking space on common property in accordance with an application for a material change of use lodged with the consent of the committee and approved by the local government; where no resolution without dissent had been passed to authorise the disposal of common property; whether the owner must reinstate the former line markings and remove their additional car and other property from the disputed area of common property. Act, ss 35(1), 59(2)(b), 62(2)&(3)(a); Small Schemes Module, ss 17(1)(d), 103(2)(a).
Expansion Place [2020] QBCCMCmr 125
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 10 March 2020
RESOLUTION WITHOUT DISSENT – where a motion proposed that space on common property pillar sign be allocated in accordance with a licence agreement and in proportion to lot entitlements. WHETHER OPPOSITION WAS UNREASONABLE– where motion failed to achieve the required resolution without dissent – whether the opposition to the motion was unreasonable in the circumstances. Act, ss 276(1), Schedule 5, Item 10
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 3 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.