Strata scheme CTS 29693
CTS 29693 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 3 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $8,000
Waterproofing and common-property repair
Indicative per-lot waterproofing and common-property repair levies (strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $4,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters.
Litigation · 3 matters
Coomera Waters [2023] QBCCMCmr 203
By-laws QBCCMCmr 26 May 2023
BY-LAW – whether a principal scheme by-law about the revetment wall is valid – GENERAL MEETING MOTION – where a motion to amend the by-law was defeated – whether the motion should be deemed passed. Act, ss 11, 11, 20, 44, 45, 58, 59, 62, 94, 169, 180; Standard Module, ss 180, 188, 189, 210, 211
Coomera Waters [2022] QBCCMCmr 260
Other QBCCMCmr 12 July 2022
PRINCIPAL BODY CORPORATE - SUPPLY OF SERVICES BY BODY CORPORATE - SECURITY SERVICES - Act, ss 158; Standard Module, ss 210.
Coomera Waters [2021] QBCCMCmr 373
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 12 August 2021
BODY CORPORATE ASSETS – where a waterfront pathway traverses principal scheme common property, subsidiary scheme common property and subsidiary scheme lots – where the path is burdened by easements for pedestrian access - whether the path is a principal body corporate asset – whether the principal scheme is responsible for maintaining the path – whether a by-law relating to the responsibility for the path is valid. Act, ss 11, 44, 45, 59, 62, 94, 95, 97, 169, 180; Standard Module 2020, ss 180, 188, 189, 190, 191
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 3 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.