Strata scheme CTS 29901
CTS 29901 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 5 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $5,600
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 5 matters.
Litigation · 5 matters
San Delles [2026] QBCCMCmr 81
Other QBCCMCmr 16 March 2026
INTERIM ORDER – whether an interim order requiring a lot owner to remove lattice is warranted. Act, s 279.
San Delles [2024] QBCCMCmr 304
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 21 August 2024
INTERIM ORDER – whether the body corporate should be prevented from acting upon general meeting resolutions for works pending final orders because of alleged technical deficiencies or unreasonable decisions by the committee in setting the agenda. Act, s 100(5); Accommodation Module, ss 152, 163.
San Delles [2021] QBCCMCmr 76
By-laws QBCCMCmr 18 February 2021
BY-LAW – whether the body corporate has enforced a by-law in the way provided in the Act. COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT STATEMENT – whether the body corporate consented to the scheme’s CMS in accordance with the Act; whether the CMS is enforceable. Act, ss 59, 62, 94, 182; Land Title Act 1994, s 115L
San Delles [2020] QBCCMCmr 107
Other QBCCMCmr 4 March 2020
REASONABLENESS – whether committee acted unreasonably in refusing to give permission to keep dog Act, s 100(5)
San Delles [2020] QBCCMCmr 30
Other QBCCMCmr 21 January 2020
INTERIM ORDER – where interim order made to permit dog to be kept – where parties apply for interim order to be varied – whether to vary order. Act, s 279(2)
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 5 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.