Strata scheme CTS 30074
CTS 30074 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 4 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $5,000
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 4 matters.
Litigation · 4 matters
Glades Easthill South [2023] QBCCMCmr 412
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 24 October 2023
BY-LAWS – whether the respondent has parked vehicles on common property visitor parking spaces in breach of the by-law – whether orders are warranted - COSTS – whether the respondent should reimburse the applicant’s application fees. Act, ss 94, 185
Glades Easthill South [2023] QBCCMCmr 399
Costs and procedure QBCCMCmr 17 October 2023
COMMITTEE PROCEDURES – whether meeting minutes are accurate –COSTS – whether the application is frivolous, vexatious, misconceived or without substance – whether costs should be awarded. Act, s 270, Accommodation Module, s 63
Glades Easthill South [2023] QBCCMCmr 121
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 22 March 2023
MAINTENANCE – where the applicant wants the body corporate to undertake repairs – whether the body corporate is responsible for the work – whether orders are warranted. Act, s 163; Accommodation Module, ss 170, 201
Glades Easthill South [2023] QBCCMCmr 44
Other QBCCMCmr 7 February 2023
Whether an interim order is necessary because of the nature or urgency of the circumstances to which the application relates. Act, s 279.
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 4 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.