Strata scheme CTS 30946
CTS 30946 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 10 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $8,000
Waterproofing and common-property repair
Indicative per-lot waterproofing and common-property repair levies (strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $6,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 10 matters.
Litigation · 10 matters
Chevron Renaissance [2024] QBCCMCmr 145
By-laws QBCCMCmr 15 April 2024
COMMITTEE DECISION– REASONABLENESS - where committee has restricted access to secure parking spaces so that the number of fobs programmed to allow access to the secured car park is equal to the number of car spaces allocated to each unit – whether a decision on a restricted issue – whether decision reasonable in the circumstances. Act, s276. Act, ss 94(1), 100(5), 276; Accommodation Module, s 44.
Chevron Renaissance [2023] QBCCMCmr 449
By-laws QBCCMCmr 16 November 2023
BY-LAWS – where the applicant complains of intrusive noise from the lot above that she attributes to inadequate acoustic insulation beneath the vinyl flooring and tools being used within the lot – where the vinyl flooring was installed by a previous owner of the lot – whether the flooring was installed in compliance with the by-laws – whether the present owner must engage an acoustic engineer to test the floor’s compliance with the by-laws, change the flooring, or take other measures to reduce the noise in the applicant’s lot. Act, ss 167, 270(1)(e).
Chevron Renaissance [2023] QBCCMCmr 430
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 6 November 2023
GENERAL MEETING – whether notices of extraordinary general meeting were properly distributed – whether allegations of pre-filled voting forms are substantiated – whether committee followed procedures to approve motions for general meeting – whether individual motions and resolutions were valid. Act, s 100(5); Accommodation Module, ss 79, 125, 147, 174
Chevron Renaissance [2023] QBCCMCmr 375
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 27 September 2023
APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – whether committee resolutions should be prevented from being implemented until their validity is determined. Act, ss 242, 279; Accommodation Module, ss 44(1)(b)
Chevron Renaissance [2023] QBCCMCmr 53
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 13 February 2023
APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – whether the body corporate should be prevented from acting upon all general meeting resolutions pending final orders because it gave insufficient notice of the extraordinary general meeting or because of issues with voting forms – whether the body corporate should be prevented from acting on specific resolutions pending final orders because those specific motions did not comply with statutory requirements. Act, s 279(1); Accommodation Module, ss 79, 95, 125, 147, 174 and 176.
Chevron Renaissance [2022] QBCCMCmr 146
By-laws QBCCMCmr 13 April 2022
Whether there is good reason to waive non-compliance with a statutory time limit; whether the committee had power to make a decision; whether the body corporate had power to charge an owner for the supply of electricity and water to the owner’s lot; whether a by-law is invalid. Act, 100, 150, 180, 196, 242; Accommodation Module, ss 44, 152, 153, 200.
Chevron Renaissance [2021] QBCCMCmr 313
Other QBCCMCmr 28 June 2021
INTERIM ORDER – whether an interim order is necessary because of the nature or urgency of the circumstances to which the application relates. Act, s 279
Chevron Renaissance [2021] QBCCMCmr 208
By-laws QBCCMCmr 30 April 2021
BY-LAWS – where the body corporate sought to charge a lot owner for property damage – whether the decision was valid – where the decision purported to rely on two by-laws – whether the by-laws are valid. Act, ss 169, 180
Chevron Renaissance [2020] QBCCMCmr 272
Other QBCCMCmr 26 May 2020
Chevron Renaissance [2020] QBCCMCmr 144
Other QBCCMCmr 20 March 2020
INTERIM ORDER – whether an interim order is warranted. Act, s 279
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 10 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.