Strata scheme CTS 32474
CTS 32474 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 2 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Severe- $70,000
Combustible cladding rectification
Indicative per-lot cladding special levies of $15k to $220k (StrataClear 2026; ABC News 2025). Program context: NSW Project Remediate. Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $3,700
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 2 matters.
Litigation · 2 matters
Marquis On Main [2024] QBCCMCmr 202
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 29 May 2024
ADMINISTRATION OF COMMON PROPERTY; EXCLUSIVE USE – where the body corporate committee removed a key from a door on common property, denying the applicant access to the stairs beyond; where the applicant wishes to continue using the stairs to access common property on the rooftop and as a potential fire escape from the upper levels of her lot; whether the body corporate must reinstate the key or compensate the applicant for lost access to the rooftop. Act, ss 94(1)(a), 270(1)(c).
Marquis on Main [2023] QBCCMCmr 447
Building defects QBCCMCmr 14 November 2023
PROPERTY DAMAGE – COSTS - where the applicant says defects on their balconies were caused by the failure of the waterproof membrane and the actions of the body corporate’s window-cleaning contractors – whether the body corporate should reimburse the applicant for repair costs – whether the body corporate must carry out repairs – whether the body corporate is liable for other damage and other costs. Act, s 281; Standard Module, ss 180, 211
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 2 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.