Strata scheme CTS 32967
CTS 32967 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 3 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Elevated- $25,000
Serious building-defect rectification
Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $4,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters.
Litigation · 3 matters
Wings Residential Resort & Spa [2023] QBCCMCmr 149
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 4 April 2023
ANIMAL BY-LAW – whether a by-law requiring animals to be carried across areas of the common property inside the scheme’s building is oppressive or unreasonable Act, ss 62, 94, 169, 180(7)
Wings Residential Resort & Spa [2021] QBCCMCmr 429
Other QBCCMCmr 10 September 2021
ASSOCIATE – whether a candidate for election was an associate of a service contractor or letting agent; whether the body corporate elected an ineligible person to be a voting member of the committee. Act, ss 99, 309; Accommodation Module, s 11.
Wings Residential Resort & Spa [2021] QBCCMCmr 52
Building defects QBCCMCmr 3 February 2021
COMPENSATION – where the applicant claims water ingress caused damage to his property – where the applicant claims the water ingress was due to a body corporate maintenance failure – whether the body corporate is liable for the applicant’s claimed losses. Act, s 281
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 3 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.