Strata scheme CTS 33007
CTS 33007 · Registration date not recorded · Lot count not recorded · Queensland checked 30 June 2026
Public record: 4 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
- 4 tribunal or court matters, the most serious about repairs and common property
- $30,000 indicative cost exposure per lot, elevated band
The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a strata records search before you bid.
-
Public record checked
Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
- Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a strata records search if you do not have it yet.
- Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
-
Decide
Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.
Risk read
What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a strata records search before you bid.
-
4 litigation matters on record
Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.
-
Water-ingress dispute on record
At least one matter touches water, ingress, or waterproofing, the single most common driver of strata special levies. Confirm whether it has been fully rectified.
-
Building-defect dispute on record
A matter touches building defects or rectification work. Ask whether the work is funded and whether the builder's warranty still applies.
Cost exposure
Elevated exposureAn indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.
| Driver | Good | Expected | Worst |
|---|---|---|---|
Serious building-defect rectification A building-defect dispute appears in this scheme's record. Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter. | $8,000 | $25,000 | $80,000 |
Tribunal and legal costs 4 tribunal or court matters on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 4 matters. | $600 | $5,000 | $18,900 |
| Total per lot | $8,600 | $30,000 | $98,900 |
Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.
Questions to ask before you bid
- 1
Has the water-ingress issue that went to the tribunal been fully rectified, and who paid for it?
Because we found a water/waterproofing dispute on record.
- 2
What by-laws apply to pets, parking, short-stay letting, and renovations, and have any been disputed?
Because we found a by-law matter on record.
- 3
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
- 4
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
- 5
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?
Ask about this building
Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.
Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 4 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.
Building record
Strata plan CTS 33007 is on the register.
Location not mapped for this scheme yet. Map coverage is New South Wales today. Open the full map.
Litigation
- Iola Gardens [2024] QBCCMCmr 275
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 29 July 2024
REASONABLESS – where the applicant constructed a shed on common property in the scheme’s basement carpark – where the body corporate passed a motion at a general meeting for the shed to be removed but the applicant submits the decision is unreasonable – whether the orders sought by the applicant are warranted in the circumstances. Act, ss 94
- Iola Gardens [2024] QBCCMCmr 82
By-laws QBCCMCmr 29 February 2024
NUISANCE / BY-LAWS – where the applicant alleges the respondents are making excessive noise which is impacting the peaceful enjoyment of his lot – whether the orders sought by the applicant are warranted in the circumstances. Act, ss 167, 185
- Iola Gardens [2023] QBCCMCmr 483
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 12 December 2023
APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDER – where the applicant constructed a shed on common property in the scheme’s basement carpark – where the body corporate voted at a general meeting for the shed to be removed but the applicant submits the decision is unreasonable and in breach of the Act and the code of conduct – whether there are circumstances to warrant granting an interim order in this case. Act, ss 94, 100; Standard Module, s 52
- Iola Gardens [2020] QBCCMCmr 187
Building defects QBCCMCmr 9 April 2020
ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING – COMMITTEE – where applicants denied entry to annual general meeting – where applicants unable to nominate for committee ordinary member position from floor of meeting – whether to declare applicant to be a committee member IMPROVEMENTS – where applicants request to make improvements to common property refused by committee – whether refusal unreasonable – whether to order that approval be given for improvements MAINTENANCE – where applicants suffered water ingress and sought advice from roofer – where dispute as to whether Body Corporate has followed up roofer’s recommendations – whether to order Body Corporate to follow up roofer’s recommendations Act, s 100(5); Standard Module, ss 27, 164
Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 4 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.
Deep report · coming soon
On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.