Strata scheme CTS 33293
CTS 33293 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 3 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $8,000
Waterproofing and common-property repair
Indicative per-lot waterproofing and common-property repair levies (strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $4,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters.
Litigation · 3 matters
Varsity Towers [2024] QBCCMCmr 50
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 9 February 2024
GENERAL MEETING RESOLUTION – whether a resolution to engage a utilities service contractor was valid - where proposed expenditure exceeded Relevant Limit for Major Spending – whether two quotations required. Act, ss 94, 276; Accommodation Module, s 163
Varsity Towers [2023] QBCCMCmr 484
Other QBCCMCmr 13 December 2023
APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – where the applicant argues that a motion to engage a contractor to install water meters was void – where the motion failed – whether the body corporate should be prevented from engaging a contractor until the validity of the motion can be decided. Act, s 279(1).
Varsity Towers [2023] QBCCMCmr 330
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 24 August 2023
GENERAL MEETING MOTIONS – whether motions involving proposed spending above the major spending limit required two quotes INTERIM ORDER – whether an interim order is necessary because of the nature or urgency of the circumstances to which the application relates. \- whether Adjudicator can be satisfied that an application raises a serious legal question and the balance of convenience between the parties justifies injunctive relief. SDW2 Pty Ltd v JLF Corporation Pty Ltd [[2017] QSC 001](/cgi-bin/LawCite?cit=%5b2017%5d%20QSC%20001 "View LawCiteRecord") Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill [[2006] HCA 46](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/46.html "View Case") Act, s 279. Accommodation Module, s 163
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 3 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.